What is the Gavrikov thing? Either way, I don’t think he was the solution to anything either and I wonder why Gudbranson doesn’t get any credit for the teams PK statistics when the numbers show they are being effective, like say a Kuraly or Sillinger.
Why do certain guys get excused for not having guys “mesh” well with them, while with others it’s literally held against them. And I hate the inconsistency, people picking and choosing and/or flip flopping on where blame lays between the players, coaching, and management in different situations. IMO the rest of the team has a bigger negative impact on Gudbranson than he has on the team.
Jarmo has admittedly destroyed a team that WAS built well. I don’t think there’s THAT many individual players that are an actual issue, but the overall BUILD is still way off, and has been unbelievably terrible the last few years.
I think the negativity thrown Severson and Gudbranson’s way has been generally undeserved. They are both somewhat overpaid and not perfect players or perfect for what is needed, but I’m not sure who really is, and they fill a role. Up until recently Provorov has been seemingly overrated by many and I don’t see a big difference (if any) in skill or impact between him and Bean.
We have no idea what other options were realistically available. Questions about if Provorov/Severson were the right guys to bring in were there from day 1. Think it’s fascinating how guys like Severson/Gudbranson are seemingly looked at negatively by most because of their cap hits, in relation to a guy like Laine.