Injury Report: The Eddy Punch Clock Memorial Infirmary Thread | 2024-2025 Edition

Lat

Registered User
Oct 12, 2005
740
896
think the obvious short term "solution" is to put brannstrom on the right next to Hughes, and then incorporate Forbort and Desharnais.

I think I'd actually prefer Friedman over Forbort. Has he been tried being paired with Quinn Hughes yet?

Hughes-Friedman
Soucy-Myers
Brannstrom-Desharnais

might be passable for an interim solution
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peen

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
31,643
27,986
I think I'd actually prefer Friedman over Forbort. Has he been tried being paired with Quinn Hughes yet?

Hughes-Friedman
Soucy-Myers
Brannstrom-Desharnais

might be passable for an interim solution
I don't think this is any worse or better than Forbort instead, but there's just no world where Tocchet goes for that. He wants the big crease clearers, even at the expense of puck movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lat

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,888
5,115
I'm willing to excuse management for a lot of the bad luck that has happened this season, but I certainly won't excuse them on Hronek's injury. This management absolutely rolled the dice going into the year with basically only two clear top four defensemen, and now its biting them in the ass. Not only that, but they made that gamble with an unhealth Demko and Silovs as their starter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuckles

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,224
14,014
Vancouver
I'm willing to excuse management for a lot of the bad luck that has happened this season, but I certainly won't excuse them on Hronek's injury. This management absolutely rolled the dice going into the year with basically only two clear top four defensemen, and now its biting them in the ass. Not only that, but they made that gamble with an unhealth Demko and Silovs as their starter.
I mean Hronek’s injury wasn’t a result of wear and tear. It’s more of a freak accident on a rather small hit in which he lost his balance and slammed shoulder first into the boards.

I agree in general that management shit the bed with their free agent decisions on the back end.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,888
5,115
I mean Hronek’s injury wasn’t a result of wear and tear. It’s more of a freak accident on a rather small hit in which he lost his balance and slammed shoulder first into the boards.

I agree in general that management shit the bed with their free agent decisions on the back end.
My point isn't that the injury itself is bad luck, my point is that its bad management if one of your assumptions for success for your defense is that neither of your top two defensemen will be injured for any significant period of time.

Good management is all about contingency plans in the event that assumptions don't go as planned, and obviously, and especially in a cap world, you are only going to have so many contingencies. And I get that. But if you've got like a bottom five defense in the NHL if just one of your assumptions don't go as planned, then you've done a poor job managing the team.

But anyway, we also need to let things play out. While the defense looks dire at this point, its too early to write them off. And who knows, maybe one of their acquisitions will step up and exceed expectations?
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,085
48,086
Junktown
2024-11-28 12_55_06-Rick Dhaliwal_ _Sure looks like a separated shoulder for Hronek_ — Bluesky...png
 

Andy Dufresne

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
2,753
920
I'm willing to excuse management for a lot of the bad luck that has happened this season, but I certainly won't excuse them on Hronek's injury. This management absolutely rolled the dice going into the year with basically only two clear top four defensemen, and now its biting them in the ass. Not only that, but they made that gamble with an unhealth Demko and Silovs as their starter.
Yeah a good management team would have another top 2 defenceman just for injury insurance, and hey maybe another one also in case that guy gets hurt too. Doesn't seem to be any management groups up to your standards in the nhl these days i guess eh? The 70's Canadians had 4 top 2 d-men: therefore it must be possible.

This management team didn't sign Lankinen? I imagined the whole thing? Holy Shit, I need some different drugs or something. I been having these incredible hallucinations of a starting goalie called Lankinen. Freaky...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad