Given our penchant for players leaving and then coming back, I actually don't know if I actually fear losing Urbom. His upside so far has really just been his shot, which hasn't even produced much in point totals anyway. And considering he's never even finished a season anywhere as a + professionally..we'd be losing potential.
Harrold has proven he's game to do what the team needs of him, as evidenced by this time at wing. Where, I think it's hard to argue, he did a pretty damn good job at grinding.
Capability over potential. Urbom could always make his way back.
Anyways, I cut Gionta and Barch. Barring a trade Gelinas starts in Albany and will be first call up when a defensemen gets injured.
And sign Brunner
No chance Merrill makes the team unless he seriously outplays almost everyone in the remaining preseason games. Urbom and Gelinas are ahead of him on the depth chart, they've both had more experience defending professional players, and both of them have shown they can play through a full season of 70+ games. Jon Merrill's played 52 organized games since 2011.
I didn't mean any of that to sound snarky, just trying to educate. A lot of us have really high hopes for Merrill, but the Devils' log jam on defense is such that Merrill would have to blow the coaching staff away to really be considered.
Any chance that Jon Merrill makes the team? Or he's gonna starts in Albany? Thanks for the input.
That would frustrate me. Not because I don't think Severson is good, or going to be good, because he's not that bad right now and is going to be better, but because Urbom and Gelinas should get any open roster spots on defense.based on pete’s comments, I think its more like severson makes the team over merrill.
That would frustrate me. Not because I don't think Severson is good, or going to be good, because he's not that bad right now and is going to be better, but because Urbom and Gelinas should get any open roster spots on defense.
Henrique-Zajac-Ryder
Elias-Loktionov-Jagr
Clowe-Zubrus-Brunner
Carter-Josefson-Bernier
Olesz
Greene-Larsson
Salvador-Zidlicky
Gelinas-Fayne
Too many forwards!
At this point I would waive Volchenkov.
This.
Why not waive the guy since we have 2 or 3 better options in the system? The real question is this... do we pay Volchenkov to hurt our team by playing or do we pay Volchenkov to not hurt our team while utilising a better player that will cost us close to the minimum and actually make us a better club?
The answer seems pretty obvious.
For those who would say "It'll give us a bad rep if we want to sign other pending UFA's?". I'll answer that by saying "If you play well, there's no need to worry about a thing but in #28's situation, we all know that isn't the case".
At this point I would waive Volchenkov. If there aren't any takers, I'd offer him in a trade while the Devils keep 1/3 of the salary or another fraction.
So there's 10 days basically to go until rosters have to be finalized (Sept. 30th). Assuming Lou doesn't make a move before then, what do the Devils do with their roster and the waiver wire?
Do they keep Tedenby, Urbom and Josefson so they don't have to put them through waivers? Or do they take a chance? Assuming nobody is put on IR (Jagr, Clowe, Tedenby) what would you like to see them do and what do you think they'll do?
For me I think Harrold should be put on waivers for sure, better chance he clears. For forwards, I think you put Barch and Gionta on waivers as there's more upside with the younger guys.
thats what im saying, everyone seems to be under the assumption he will be bought out next year regardless. why not figure out the buyout penalty and shop him around with the idea of retaining that amount and get whatever we can.
going to have to pay that amount anyways, at least get something for it.
Would you give up as much as a 5th round pick for a guy that will drag your defensive unit to the ground?
I wouldn't give Rod Pelley for #28. If I'm taking #28, I'm asking for additional compensation like the Sharks asked when we traded them Malahkov (circumstances weren't the same but you know what I mean).
Volchenkov is the elephant in the room (he's been that for the past 2 or 3 years IMO) and the only reason he's still around is his contract.
Would you give up as much as a 5th round pick for a guy that will drag your defensive unit to the ground?
I wouldn't give Rod Pelley for #28. If I'm taking #28, I'm asking for additional compensation like the Sharks asked when we traded them Malahkov (circumstances weren't the same but you know what I mean).
Volchenkov is the elephant in the room (he's been that for the past 2 or 3 years IMO) and the only reason he's still around is his contract.