PistolPete
Registered User
- May 3, 2025
- 1,520
- 1,372
Not when they played against each otherLet the record show that the Sabres have won an ECF game more recently than the Canes.
Not when they played against each otherLet the record show that the Sabres have won an ECF game more recently than the Canes.
You're not going to get that ever uear or second year. Ebbs and flows. No seeding system is going to ensure every series is close.A remarkable thing to do. Teams that make the conference finals should theoretically be close to each other in talent. NHL absolutely needs to change the seeding system. The current one sucks and has gotten boring with the same matchups year after year. To hell with this creating rivalries crap the NHL says the current system promotes. Conference finals should be tight affairs.
Montreal has won more WCF games than Canes have ECF games!Let the record show that the Sabres have won an ECF game more recently than the Canes.
I agree. We have got to a point where there are teams who just aren't suited for regular season and become a contender in the playoffs. Florida and Edmonton seem this way. Then there are the opposite: teams who excel in the season but flounder in the playoffs. Its clear that the problem with the seeding system is that the playoffs and the regular season are just different games with different rules even. It's like using a badminton season to seed a tennis tournamentYou're not going to get that ever uear or second year. Ebbs and flows. No seeding system is going to ensure every series is close.
Inadvertantly precocious post, there. It was an up and down year...Lol come on.. are Jarvis, Svechnikov, Necas(before he was traded) just a bunch of scrubs?
You can blame anything you like if you try hard enough.... personally I'm blaming mercury being in retrograde.Can't blame injuries this time
Not suited for the regular season?I agree. We have got to a point where there are teams who just aren't suited for regular season and become a contender in the playoffs. Florida and Edmonton seem this way. Then there are the opposite: teams who excel in the season but flounder in the playoffs. Its clear that the problem with the seeding system is that the playoffs and the regular season are just different games with different rules even. It's like using a badminton season to seed a tennis tournament
The difference is length.I agree. We have got to a point where there are teams who just aren't suited for regular season and become a contender in the playoffs. Florida and Edmonton seem this way. Then there are the opposite: teams who excel in the season but flounder in the playoffs. Its clear that the problem with the seeding system is that the playoffs and the regular season are just different games with different rules even. It's like using a badminton season to seed a tennis tournament
Being the second best in a weak conference is not really controversial.It will ruffle a lot of feathers but it’s time to admit the Leafs were the second best team in the eastern conference this year
You forgot about Tampa Bay.It will ruffle a lot of feathers but it’s time to admit the Leafs were the second best team in the eastern conference this year
Toronto recently beat Tampa in play offs and Florida had an easier time with them than with the LeafsYou forgot about Tampa Bay.
If Florida is the best team that means TB is still possibly the second best who got beat by the bear before they coild get a chance to play and beat the third best.
Sure, except the issue with the regular season champion is that there are teams who just don't try to win that, and whose goal of the regular season is prepare for the playoffs, and do things like ride the LTIR longer than they would in the playoffs, avoid contact in the RS season, and even have elite players take rest days or reduced minutes in the RS to stay fresh.The difference is length.
The RS is 82 games, over the course of 28 games you can go 12 and 16 and still come out atop the league. It evens out the rises and falls and minimizes the influence of luck and random chance.
The PO- heightens random chance and luck and you go into a dip, you're done.
Then there's also the fact that the NHL RS schedule isn't equalized- some teams play each other 4 times, others only twice, not a factor if 30 points separate two teams, but if only 8 points separate them? Is that 8 point difference a function of talent difference or scheduling?
This is why it's absurd to equate Stanley Cup champions with best team of that season.
The SCC are just winners of a short tournament.
There's there too.Sure, except the issue with the regular season champion is that there are teams who just don't try to win that, and whose goal of the regular season is prepare for the playoffs, and do things like ride the LTIR longer than they would in the playoffs, avoid contact in the RS season, and even have elite players take rest days or reduced minutes in the RS to stay fresh. As an Oiler fan I'd have to say our regular season was a farce in a way, especially at the end of the regular season where the team obviously gave up on fighting for the division lead and opted to rest players and limit minutes instead, and simply making the playoffs was good enough
Recently isn't this season. Otherwise I can go back and say Carolina is better than Toronto because they beat them in '02- that's recent to me!Toronto recently beat Tampa in play offs and Florida had an easier time with them than with the Leafs
Yeah I'm a Bolts fan but it's hard to argue with this. Only thing I can see arguing is in an alternate universe where they didn't piss away Game 4 in 11 seconds maybe the series goes different.Toronto recently beat Tampa in play offs and Florida had an easier time with them than with the Leafs