I probably won't say much until it's into the game a bit.
Just going to say Go Leafs Go and...
I hope they actually give a f*** tonight
Just going to say Go Leafs Go and...
I hope they actually give a f*** tonight
I'm sure you're past self can help you thereI felt a tinge of optimism, who do I call?
They didn’t call it and it’s not reviewable so it didn’t matter.I never thought that it would be overturned, it was going in, but Carlo definitely intended to touch the puck with his broken stick.
It's a bit of semantics, but if he intended to and there's no provision to say that playing the puck with a broken stick wouldn't stop the play, it's a penalty and whistle as soon as he touches it.
Flip side, if they never called it a penalty (I'm unsure if they did), doesn't matter much who touched what after the fact unless it's reviewable. If it is, the play it's dead when he touches I'd say.
I really don't think that's why we're where we're at though, that play is more just interesting rules wise is all.
There wasnt a delayed penalty.Covering the puck isn't a hockey play? WTAF?
There is no penalty review other than a high sticking major that can be reduced to two or four minute penalty.The entire reason they were reviewing is because Florida argued that Carlo played the puck with a broken stick. It wasn't a goal review, it was a penalty review.
And quite frankly, I've never heard of this "intended to make a hockey play" BS. Does that mean if the puck glances off somebody's stick and the person wasn't skating it doesn't count towards ending the play on a delayed penalty?
Sounds a hell of a lot like the semantic bullshit the NFL came up with after the infamous Calvin Johnson "non-catch" in 2010. "Uh, well, the ref was right because he's required to take at least two steps with the ball in his hand without going out of bounds before it's a catch! What do you mean, it's not in the rulebook? We'll put it in next year, because the refs can't be wrong!"
For the game tonight or the series??What are the betting odds on the Leafs winning this?
+185-+190 tonight. +525 to win the series.Well lets deal with game 6
Hold it there and score again in the second to go up 2-0. Don’t get the dreaded early 3-0 lead.Matthews!!!!!
Hell yeah what a start 1-0 already!!
If you want to compare it to the other 3-2 series. Winnipeg is +310 to win the series and +130 to win tomorrow. So basically, they think Toronto has no shot.Well lets deal with game 6
The bookies know all the injuries on every team.If you want to compare it to the other 3-2 series. Winnipeg is +310 to win the series and +130 to win tomorrow. So basically, they think Toronto has no shot.
Matthews!!!!!
Hell yeah what a start 1-0 already!!
if you watched the last few games you would see why the odds are like that, come on now!If you want to compare it to the other 3-2 series. Winnipeg is +310 to win the series and +130 to win tomorrow. So basically, they think Toronto has no shot.
Berube has lost his marbles
Just pointing out what Vegas thinks. I think the Leafs win tonight.if you watched the last few games you would see why the odds are like that, come on now!
is the script out or are you projecting lolMatthews!!!!!
Hell yeah what a start 1-0 already!!