Yes there are question Mark's. But there are a lot of young candidates in the system to fill the question marks. And two of the major question Mark's are Laine and Dach. I'm really hoping we see them healthy next year, and playing with Demidov, with Newhook moving into a bottom six role. Or, if HGo get a 2c this summer to play with Laine and Demidov, would be sick to see a 3rd line of Anderson - Dach - Newhook.
At this point I suppose HuGo are looking for upgrades at every position they can find one. But where else do you see an area of need aside from a 2c, a top pair RD, and perhaps an upgrade on Laine in the following present and future depth chart:
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Laine - Dach/Hage - Demidov
Newhook - Dach/Hage - Anderson/Kapanen
Heineman - Evans/Beck - Armia/Gallagher/Roy
/Xhekaj/Tuch/Mesar
Hutson - Matheson/Reinbacher
Guhle - Carrier
Xhekaj - Savard/Mailloux
Engstrom, Bogdan
Monty/Fowler
Dobes/Russian prospect
Primeau/Miller
Personally, I don't see Dach at C, period. He sucks in the dot and doesn't produce enough offense to make up for it. His defense also sucks, which makes him playing C on the third line even less likely than sit might on a purely offensive 2nd line.
Dach's future in the NHL -- never mind just Montreal -- is on the wing. In the most ideal situation, it is as a top-6 winger. Otherwise, Dach will need to reinvent himself as a bottom-6 winger, which I'm not certain he is willing to do right now. Might have to really hit the bottom of the barrel for that to be triggered.
I also don't think that Newhook brings enough to be in the top-9 of a contender's roster and he sure as hell isn't a 4th line player/grinder. here's another player that might need to reinvent himself as a bottom-6 player, but, apart from being fast and having a little bit of remaining offensive upside, he lacks hockey IQ, defensive awareness and physicality.
Newhook amounts to an okay place filler on a rebuilding team. Not horrible, but not really good either. an average player on an average team, not a meaningful role player on the bottom-6 of a contender.
On the positive side, I think that beck has the qualities to play on a third line at C in the NHL, and reducing him to 4th line duties in any projections clearly undervalues either the quality of player he is, or his ambition as a player. I honestly don't think that Beck would be/feel appreciated if relegated to having a career as a 4th line C. He's not just a defensive, F/O machine. Maybe in his first season at the NHL level, but he should be able to stake a claim to the 3C role quickly after that.
Hage's future at C is that of a 2C, if he is to play C at the NHL level, not that of a 3C. IMO, he will fare better on the wing, even if I sincerely hope he does become a 2C at the NHL level.
I'm less optimistic than most to se Laine in the top-6 for the long haul, but a see him with complementary line mates on an exploitation 3rd line with two speedy complements, one that also plays physical hockey and retrieves loose pucks in Heineman and with a C like Beck who keeps the puck more often than not in the dot, plays a quick, N/S style of game with a bit of a nasty side (we will eventually see more of that from him as he secures an NHL job). Beck and Heineman can cycle the puck back to Laine to exploit his one real skill -- his shot. They can also add the defensive dimension that Laine lacks to this 3rd line. Laine can then also act as a PP specialist form the majority of his goals/points, without costing the team at even strength.
That leaves us with a top-6 spot at C and at wing to fill. Maybe that is where Hage* ends up, as a 2nd line winger (RW), because he plays a fast, N/S style of game that better lends itself to playing wing. Also, as a winger, he might be only two years away, not three, or more, as he would be at C.
The hole at 2C is still quite present and, even if the solution lies somewhere at the 2025 draft, we are not seeing it play out in Montreal before three to four years from now, maybe five.
Hughes news to find a short to medium term solution, at least, outside the organization, ideally via the free agency market, to keep as many valuable draft assets as possible and to avoid touching the team's core in a trade for a 2C.
Sure, there a re many players to try in different roles to arrive at a solution within the next three years, but, outside of Demidov* (and that still needs to be confirmed at the NHL level*), there doesn't appear to be many blue chip candidates to fill these vacant roles.
Caufield - Suzuki - Demidov*
Slafkovsky - XXX - Hage*
Heineman - Beck - Laine/Roy*
XXX - XXX - XXX
I'm not too keen on Dach and Newhook's medium to long term futures in Montreal and Roy really hasn't been able to translate his AHL production to the NHL level. Will he ever?
Maybe Dach succeeds in emulating his production level from his stint on the Caufield - Suzuki - Dach line of yonder year. I'd be the happiest fan because that would allow for the following lineup without Laine, in the likeliest advent that he doesn't get re-signed/extended by Hughes:
Caufield - Suzuki - Dach
Slafkovsky -
Kapanen - Demidov*
Heineman - Beck - Hage*
XXX - XXX - XXX
Can Kapanen become a two-way C on a second line. He appears to have plenty of offensive upside to Goa along with solid defensive play in the highest Swedish league. It is too premature and excessively hopeful to slot Kapanen in as a 2C down the line, but what a find that would be, if it came to materialize!
Rounding out the roster with 4th line players appears to be the easiest of tasks for the Habs given the candidates in the pipeline; F. Xhekaj Tuch, Thorpe, etc...
Plus, there will be interesting picks from 2025, I'm sure...
Yet, lots of serious question marks for the top-9, even if we think there are a lot of plug and play forwards? Nothing set in stone, really and we could be several players away, still.