Zman5778
Moderator
That right there is enough to make me VERY wary of trading for Wright.Craig Rivet had a huge hard-on for Wright.
And I'm only half joking.
That right there is enough to make me VERY wary of trading for Wright.Craig Rivet had a huge hard-on for Wright.
Niklas Kokko is a goalie. Not Kaappo KakkoDon't see why Seattle would want Norris at all. They'd likely view Norris as a guy we're dumping onto them. They've got Beniers/Stephenson/Gaudreau/Meyers with Catton and O'Brien waiting in the wings.
I also have absolutely no idea why we'd want Kakko if we're re-signing Tuch.
Byram/Levi/Mrtka/20 for Wright/Evans/7 seems like a hellacious overpay on our end.
Just simplify it: Byram/Levi/20 for Wright and 7. At least the value is far better there. I'm still not sure I do that deal.....but the value is at least close to even.
He loved him as an underager playing Jr (Wright got some kind of exemption to play). Thought he was a special player. He was connected to his coach or something - can't remember how, but he had a lot of exposure to him as a young players.That right there is enough to make me VERY wary of trading for Wright.
And I'm only half joking.
My bad on the Kokko/Kakko thing. I've seen Kokko as a typo often enough (like Byrum or Powers) so I autocorrected in my brain. Zero idea Seattle had a goalie named Kokko.Niklas Kokko is a goalie. Not Kaappo Kakko
Botteril just hired Allvin the #1 Norris & Byram fanboy. so I doubt they see Norris as a dump.
and i had taken out mrtka i misstyped it.
Byram/Levi/Norris/20OA
for
Wright/Evans/Kokko/7OA
I mean you could be right, just take out Norris.My bad on the Kokko/Kakko thing. I've seen Kokko as a typo often enough (like Byrum or Powers) so I autocorrected in my brain. Zero idea Seattle had a goalie named Kokko.
And I honestly don't think Allvin would have that much influence on things right away....certainly not enough to make Botterill pull the trigger.
The Stanley/Schenn trade was bad.We are dealing with the inheritance of Murray messing up our prospect pipeline, Botterill with one disaster after the other leading to massive dead cap this season and Adams inaction and inability to consolidate picks and prospects into a team.
Jarmo has a great situation as GM but it's also very easy to mess up and a bit of a minefield really. Not a fan of him making the team slower at the tdl and giving up resources for crap.
Would have preferred overpaying for useful players and being more selective with the moves. Jarmo so far gives a very ad hoc low impulse control vibe to me. More of a butcher than a surgeon.
The obvious solution:If they let Tuch walk, move Greenway in a cap related deal, lose Malenstyn and have already dealt Kesselring... That's 6'4", 6'6", 6'2", and 6'5" all departing. I would assume Stanley's also not coming back since there has been no indication from the Sabres on that or any of the agent mouthpieces who get paid as insiders. That's a lot of size coming out when everyone else in the division is still trying to get bigger. Not sure they want to go full smurf with the replacements.
I am planting my flag in the wanting to be in the Shane Wright business. I think he’s going to be a change of scenery and unlocked situation. Put him on a team with juice and he’ll find it. He’s too smart and plays the game right (Wright?) for him to not find it in a better situation.
Wright isn't a burner but he's not slow by any means. He played a lot better Under Bylsma, this Lambert system is clearly a bad fit for his skill set. I see him like Byfield, he could really take off under a different coach. I think Lindy and the Sabres system would unlock his potential. He's excellent at controlled entries and he'd have much better linemates in Buffalo.I get that he gets inside and plays the game the right way and has good IQ, but his NHL Edge stats are scary.
View attachment 1256521
He's also terrible at faceoffs (I know you don't care about that, but others do).
I don't think they want a slow, average sized guy that can't win faceoffs at center. They probably prefer the 40 or so games they'll get from Norris.
True, but given Jarmo's trades at the deadline- I think he wants to build a team that has some size and plays with tenacity.If they let Tuch walk, move Greenway in a cap related deal, lose Malenstyn and have already dealt Kesselring... That's 6'4", 6'6", 6'2", and 6'5" all departing. I would assume Stanley's also not coming back since there has been no indication from the Sabres on that or any of the agent mouthpieces who get paid as insiders. That's a lot of size coming out when everyone else in the division is still trying to get bigger. Not sure they want to go full smurf with the replacements.
I get that he gets inside and plays the game the right way and has good IQ, but his NHL Edge stats are scary.
View attachment 1256521
He's also terrible at faceoffs (I know you don't care about that, but others do).
I don't think they want a slow, average sized guy that can't win faceoffs at center. They probably prefer the 40 or so games they'll get from Norris.
That right there is enough to make me VERY wary of trading for Wright.
And I'm only half joking.
Faceoffs are such a jerk off stat. If we are struggling bad enough, jarmo will go get an old faceoff guy at the deadline. Like how Montreal went and got Danault.Oh no not faceoffs.
We need to get to the top of the league in faceoffs like (checks notes) Toronto was. And not at the bottom like (check notes) the division winning Sabres were.
Throw everything at faceoffs!