Speculation: - The 2026-27 Roster Speculation Thread: Summer Edition - Throw in All The Oars, We're Trading for Battleships | Page 121 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: The 2026-27 Roster Speculation Thread: Summer Edition - Throw in All The Oars, We're Trading for Battleships

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Keep #4. Shop #20 for a 2nd pair defenseman or upgrade at forward or goal.
This is where I'm at now too. I was interested in a Hellebuyck trade before the Byram trade under the assumption no 1C's would be available for trade and Hellebuyck was the best option for winning next year and beyond.

Now I'd rather pick at #4 to get our 1C of the future, then see what you can get with #20 and Mrtka maybe. If you can get a good young top 4 D or Hellebuyck then great. Otherwise I'd wait and see how the seasons going.
 
I doubt they re-sign Tuch, even with last night's trade opening up cap space.

I think a significant portion of the cap space they have will go to re-signing Benson, Krebs, and Malenstyn.

And I do not believe in the Moneyball idea of replacing Tuch in the aggregate with returnees.

Jarmo is going to move some futures for immediate help, I believe. It's just a matter of what he gives up and what he gets back, for me.

But, we shall see.
It's possible to give Benson, Krebs, Malenstyn, and Tuch their AFP contracts without throwing a grenade in the middle of the roster. I worked that out and posted it just as proof of concept.

I disagree with the approach of trading picks now for future help. That's just me. I'd rather re-sign Tuch, or bring in 1-2 replacement UFAs with the money for his contract, and add players like Bjorck and Morozov to the prospect pool.

Part of my reason for that line of thinking is that I do not see the Sabres beating Florida or Carolina next season to get to the finals. It's going to be a 2-3 season grind. I'd rather have cheap, good players in a season or two ready to step in and playing on ELCs, than try to go for broke now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldgoalie
The Sabres have 22.1M in Cap space currently per Sabres Live
Assuming Benson gets an extension in the 7M range you'll be looking at closer to 15M. So there's still room there for re-signing Malenstyn and Krebs plus one big addition before needing to move out any/much salary.
 
The Byram return was insanely good, but fans and media are being a bit too giddy imo.

You have to replace a 2nd pair D now. If you can get a Carlson on 2 years until a prospect is ready then Ok, If not, that's a big hole in what was the strength of your playoff run.

You also loose size, physicality, pk in GW that will need to be replaced in some form.

You have two picks (one being extremely attractive) and what is likely a 3rd pair physical dman in return right now.
You're not wrong. It does leave holes and Jarmo has work to do.

But gaining more valuable assets and freeing up just over $9m on cap space opens sooooo many doors to a bunch of different possibilities to where it's hard to not be giddy. We'll have to wait and see what Jarmo does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValJamesDuex
It's possible to give Benson, Krebs, Malenstyn, and Tuch their AFP contracts without throwing a grenade in the middle of the roster. I worked that out and posted it just as proof of concept.

I disagree with the approach of trading picks now for future help. That's just me. I'd rather re-sign Tuch, or bring in 1-2 replacement UFAs with the money for his contract, and add players like Bjorck and Morozov to the prospect pool.

Part of my reason for that line of thinking is that I do not see the Sabres beating Florida or Carolina next season to get to the finals. It's going to be a 2-3 season grind. I'd rather have cheap, good players in a season or two ready to step in and playing on ELCs, than try to go for broke now.


Tuch at $10.1M, Benson at $6.975M, Krebs at $3.5M, and Malenstyn at $2.6M eats up basically all the cap space the Sabres have today.

So, that limits what you can do significantly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Der Jaeger

Tuch at $10.1M, Benson at $6.975M, Krebs at $3.5M, and Malenstyn at $2.6M eats up basically all the cap space the Sabres have today.

So, that limits what you can do significantly.
I ran that earlier today. With Kulich and Danforth starting in Rochester, and Kozak, Carrick, and Ellis as scratches, it's $125K in cap space available. Some work to do to make that roster work but it's doable.

Not perfect but allows Jarmo to pull some trades which would need salary going out to make it work.
 
I ran that earlier today. With Kulich and Danforth starting in Rochester, and Kozak, Carrick, and Ellis as scratches, it's $125K in cap space available. Some work to do to make that roster work but it's doable.

Not perfect but allows Jarmo to pull some trades which would need salary going out to make it work.
Why is Krebs included in any analysis? He is a jag. Needing to make room for forwards he is the obvious odd man out.
 
I ran that earlier today. With Kulich and Danforth starting in Rochester, and Kozak, Carrick, and Ellis as scratches, it's $125K in cap space available. Some work to do to make that roster work but it's doable.

Not perfect but allows Jarmo to pull some trades which would need salary going out to make it work.

I just don't think he rolls into the season with Timmins as a top 4 D with how much they relied on the top 4 last season and his interest in Parayko.

I think he makes other moves and Tuch isn't back.

Plus, I expect him to do something in goal with the Hellebuyck, Bob, and UPL rumors out there.
 
I just don't think he rolls into the season with Timmins as a top 4 D with how much they relied on the top 4 last season and his interest in Parayko.

I think he makes other moves and Tuch isn't back.

Plus, I expect him to do something in goal with the Hellebuyck, Bob, and UPL rumors out there.
My prediction:
- A top-4 defenseman who has a mature game.
- A new goalie to replace UPL
- a middle-6 (or better) center

That's what I think he's eyeing anyways. Maybe another winger if he's truly keen on moving Quiin. Doesn't mean that's what he'll get. The market is going to determine how many moves he makes, and while it was amazing the value he got for Byram- that also tells me that the prices for established players is pretty high right now. Time will tell, but Im expecting at least two of those areas to be addressed this offseason.
 
Why is Krebs included in any analysis? He is a jag. Needing to make room for forwards he is the obvious odd man out.
To show where the team would be if he’s re-signed. If I didn’t then other way, there would be questions about if the Sabres keep him.

It’s just a model to see what could work, not what I think they should do.
I just don't think he rolls into the season with Timmins as a top 4 D with how much they relied on the top 4 last season and his interest in Parayko.

I think he makes other moves and Tuch isn't back.

Plus, I expect him to do something in goal with the Hellebuyck, Bob, and UPL rumors out there.
I think that as well.

When I ran the same sim, with Tuch, and moved McLeod, UPL, and 1st to Winnipeg, it left around $50k in cap space. So it’s doable.

A move of a roster player or two for a 4D is also within striking distance.

That’s all possible with re-signing Tuch.
 
Never cook again. Tuch is gone, but might as well put him at 11m to be reasonable. Take out Ostlund and Quinn for helle. Krebs to the sun.
Good sir, I've been cooking up terrible trade ideas for over 25 years. Why stop now?

Tuch at $10.1M, Benson at $6.975M, Krebs at $3.5M, and Malenstyn at $2.6M eats up basically all the cap space the Sabres have today.

So, that limits what you can do significantly.

Another reason why there are Quinn whispers perhaps

To me, you only move Quinn if Tage re-ups. If Tage walks, Quinn has more value to the team.

I also wonder about Patrick Kane is Tuch walks.
 
But at 3.5 at those point in time, it should be an objectively easy call. No matter how much they like him. He is just a guy.

I don't even want to trade Krebs but to me, out of what's left he would be the choice if one of the forwards had to go. I doubt the team feels that way and I'm expecting to be disappointed when they let Quinn go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tatanka

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad