Byram looks more valuable than Cozens right now. Even Peterka. The guy is on a 40-point pace, doesn't play defense, isn't good at center, isn't great at PP, and this is his second season of fall, not first. Pettersson and Cozens are simply heaven and earth as players, and there's a big gap between them if you take all the strengths of one player and the other.The thing with cozens, is that if a team trades for him as a main piece in a deal like one for Pettersson, it's because they believe in his future. And if they believe in his future, 7M is a decent deal
Cozens is younger, producing at a higher rate 5v5 than EP, and has shown flashes of offensive ability, and still carries the defensive "workhorse" identity.Byram looks more valuable than Cozens right now. Even Peterka. The guy is on a 40-point pace, doesn't play defense, isn't good at center, isn't great at PP, and this is his second season of fall, not first. Pettersson and Cozens are simply heaven and earth as players, and there's a big gap between them if you take all the strengths of one player and the other.
This is so true -and sad - and it’s not just under Adams.Seems to be tradition of this team to give guys who are in contract years prime minutes that elevate their stats. He's played almost all of his time with power and Dahlin
Follow the chain of posts. I was being more or less completely facetious. It started with me hailing the Colton Poolman trade as the "first domino" to fall.....which very obviously it isn't.Why does it need to be dollar in, dolllar out? Vancouver may appreciate the cap space, and almost definitely won’t give up both Joshua and EP anyway
One stays, one goes. Don't really care which is which at this point.Keep Byram, trade Power. This should not be a controversial take.
Yup. Keep the guy who is not a complete defensive black hole.Keep Byram, trade Power. This should not be a controversial take.
Follow the chain of posts. I was being more or less completely facetious. It started with me hailing the Colton Poolman trade as the "first domino" to fall.....which very obviously it isn't.
Keep Byram, trade Power. This should not be a controversial take.
Then use Cozens or Peterka to get a defensive defenseman for the top-4.That's been my take too. EP for OP.
Then use Cozens or Peterka to get a defensive defenseman for the top-4.
The Skinner thing was about how generalities based on nation of origin are weak.
And the big questions are about the character and makeup that Pettersson has and not just how he plays the game.
Personally, Pettersson is far from a perfect fit for what the Sabres need today. Matthew Tkachuk is the perfect fit for this team.
With the questions about Pettersson's lingering knee tendonitis and questions about whether the pressure of that big contract being a bit too much, and adding Pettersson is far from a lock for making the Sabres a lot better. And a trade for him could be very regrettable in a few years if he isn't a guy that can drive the bus here.
I like the concept. Resign ByramThat's been my take too. EP for OP.
On a team that endeavors to win multiple playoff rounds -- I think Tage would be a fine/great/excellent 2C....and hell, Cozens might make for a perfect top 6 winger.It feels like they are back to where they were before the beginning of Regier's pain - needing better centers. Cozens has fallen down and Thompson's not good enough.
Keep Byram, trade Power. This should not be a controversial take.
On a team that endeavors to win multiple playoff rounds -- I think Tage would be a fine/great/excellent 2C....and hell, Cozens might make for a perfect top 6 winger.
I think McLeod can be a 3C or a 4C on a team that endeavors to win multiple playoff rounds.
What we need is that legit 1C that pushes Tommer down and Cozens to wing (or out of the organization I suppose). I think we've only been saying that since LaFointaine left.....and then for the few years that Eichel wasn't actively wanting out of this mess.
I've had that curious thought as well......but I think my issue with a Tage/Cozens duo is that both of them should be shooting the puck at high volumes.Briere-Drury-Roy-Connolly-Gaustad was probably their peak in all the years after Bowman left them wrecked. I'm curious if Thompson and Cozens work as a 2nd line duo with someone else on LW. Cozens was handling the d-zone work (again) and Thompson was RW (again).
Not here. He'd just revert back to what we remember. A well structured vet team, yeah...not here.Am I crazy for thinking Ristolainen - if he truly has shored up the defensive side of his game - could be a good add?
I have zero issues with this. The transition of Thompson to C has stalled out. He's just not cut out for the defensive responsibilities the position requires. Let him move back to wing to focus on what he does best -- scoring goals.Briere-Drury-Roy-Connolly-Gaustad was probably their peak in all the years after Bowman left them wrecked. I'm curious if Thompson and Cozens work as a 2nd line duo with someone else on LW. Cozens was handling the d-zone work (again) and Thompson was RW (again).
Am I crazy for thinking Ristolainen - if he truly has shored up the defensive side of his game - could be a good add?
you apparently did not see overtime last night ?I could see Tage absolutely tearing it up again in a 1A/1B role at centre. Let him be one of The Guys with EP and Dahlin and see him blossom like Reinhart as one of The Guys with Barkov and Tkachuk