Prospect Info: The 2024 - 2025 Prospect Thread: Part 2: WE ARE SO F***ING BACK

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
The prospect pool is floundering. Big years from some last year have slowed this year. Normal for a bunch of tweener prospects. Canucks need to draft in the first two rounds multiple years in a row and hit at least once a year for any sort of sustained success. As long as management doesn't f-up the rest of GMing.

Anyone who thought these junior players were en route to regular NHL duty in 3 years were absolutely dreaming. The fact that D-Petey jumped in to NHL action and looked as good as he did has me more excited about our prospect group. Not really floundering with such a hit there....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wry n Ginger
Anyone who thought these junior players were en route to regular NHL duty in 3 years were absolutely dreaming. The fact that D-Petey jumped in to NHL action and looked as good as he did has me more excited about our prospect group. Not really floundering with such a hit there....
One player makes you excited our the prospect group. That shows how f-ing sad the group is then. Lol.
 
DPettersson breaking out massively and Lekkerimaki pacing for 50 goals is way more important than if Riley Patterson is scoring at a good rate or whatever.

Yeah, we have 3 prospects (Wilander, EP2, Lekkerimaki) who are top-50 in the NHL all progressing very well.

The strength of a prospect pool is the top guys, not whether Romani or Alcos have elevated their stock or not.

Our prospect pool at D might be the best in the NHL, full stop.
 
Anyone who thought these junior players were en route to regular NHL duty in 3 years were absolutely dreaming. The fact that D-Petey jumped in to NHL action and looked as good as he did has me more excited about our prospect group. Not really floundering with such a hit there....
Hard to be disappointed when it looks like we got basically 2 potential top4 D and a top 6 winger and maybe 2 3rd pairing D from 2 drafts…
I think the only downer is the last draft but we did got some trade value out of Fernstom at least in the short term.
 
One player makes you excited our the prospect group. That shows how f-ing sad the group is then. Lol.

No. We have Lekkerimaki, Willander and D-Petey all looking like future NHL'ers

You are over-rating depth prospects. They don't really matter in determining the strength of a prospect pool. It is all about the top of your crop, and right now we are looking good in that area.
 
No. We have Lekkerimaki, Willander and D-Petey all looking like future NHL'ers

You are over-rating depth prospects. They don't really matter in determining the strength of a prospect pool. It is all about the top of your crop, and right now we are looking good in that area.
Canucks had no first rounder or second rounder in 2020; no first rounder in 2021; no second rounder in 2022; no second rounder in 2023; and of course no first or second rounder in 2024.

I guess there were some logical reasons for surrendering these picks at the time. And I suppose the Canucks wouldn't have 'hit' on all of them.

But you can't help but wonder how much better their prospect pipeline would be if they'd kept more of those high picks.
 
Yeah, we have 3 prospects (Wilander, EP2, Lekkerimaki) who are top-50 in the NHL all progressing very well.
...

Our prospect pool at D might be the best in the NHL, full stop.
This hadn't really occurred to me, I wonder if the rest of the league would share that opinion.

Willander
D-Petey
Kud
Mynio
Mancini

Is pretty damn solid. No clue where to slot Mancini into that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector
You're trying to reason with someone who thinks the regression of Vilmer Alriksson and Anthony Romani has tanked our prospect pool.
You tried to reason with me? "Anyone who thought these junior players were en route to regular NHL duty in 3 years were absolutely dreaming." How do you manage to come up with that from what I said?

I'm sorry I don't share the excitement about a projected 3rd pairing D playing 3rd pair D for 6 games.

The Canucks had 3 for sure NHLers Hughes, Pettersson, Demko in 2018 and since then Hoglander. Provided a lot of help to the Canucks having to pay for depth players at 2-3 times the cost. Costing assets to acquire some depth players.

You're trying to reason with someone who thinks the regression of Vilmer Alriksson and Anthony Romani has tanked our prospect pool.
You just create a whole new narrative for someone to pretend that yours is right. Impressive.
 
Dave Hall Canucks army on the prospect pool.

I think I’d be remiss if I did not run with the boss’s question out the gate, right?
What's been the biggest challenge about doing these latest prospect rankings? (aside from me asking you to write all 20 by yourself)
The truthful answer is that this Canucks’ system isn’t chock-full of high-end talent. Sure, a select few filters to the top without question, but there is a real log-jam of “hopeful projects” and older “tweener” type players.
That’s difficult to “rank.”
Realistically, the difference between each of our ranked prospects from, let’s say, 5-12 is very minimal. It’s not that the prospects within that range aren’t skilled; it’s just simply easier to pinpoint and predict what will come of a prospect such as Tom Willander or even Elias Pettersson (D).
For lack of a better term, it’s a bit of a crapshoot in that mid-to-late range.
While every team has those types of mid-range prospects, they typically don’t carry an entire prospect pool filled to the brim. Truthfully, this Canucks prospect pool is just that, with the exception of maybe four.

It’s propped up by two “blue chip” prospects, Jonathan Lekkerimaki and Tom Willander. However, that stock drops off a cliff after three or four.

 
Dave Hall Canucks army on the prospect pool.

I think I’d be remiss if I did not run with the boss’s question out the gate, right?
What's been the biggest challenge about doing these latest prospect rankings? (aside from me asking you to write all 20 by yourself)
The truthful answer is that this Canucks’ system isn’t chock-full of high-end talent. Sure, a select few filters to the top without question, but there is a real log-jam of “hopeful projects” and older “tweener” type players.
That’s difficult to “rank.”
Realistically, the difference between each of our ranked prospects from, let’s say, 5-12 is very minimal. It’s not that the prospects within that range aren’t skilled; it’s just simply easier to pinpoint and predict what will come of a prospect such as Tom Willander or even Elias Pettersson (D).
For lack of a better term, it’s a bit of a crapshoot in that mid-to-late range.
While every team has those types of mid-range prospects, they typically don’t carry an entire prospect pool filled to the brim. Truthfully, this Canucks prospect pool is just that, with the exception of maybe four.

It’s propped up by two “blue chip” prospects, Jonathan Lekkerimaki and Tom Willander. However, that stock drops off a cliff after three or four.

As does most prospect pools.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad