Teams with a one or a few gamebreaking talents, but poor depth, and vice versa?

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Which teams have a prospect pool that has at least one game breaking talent, but otherwise very poor pool due to lack of depth, and vice versa? For vice versa, I'd give it to the Flames. They have a top 5 prospect pool in terms of depth, but outside of maybe Parekh, no gamebreaking talent.

Click to read more...

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

Rangers. Gabe Perreault. Not much depth. We trade most of our draft picks.

 

[Stealth JD]

Blues have a ton of depth but no real star power. The result of drafting 10-25 each year: Dvorsky, Stenberg, Lindstein, Jiricek, Bolduc, Snuggerud, Dean, Jecho, Mrsic, Ralph, Ellis.

 

[VanJack]

The Canucks come to mind.....Jonathan Lekkerimaki and Tom Wilander.......after that, who knows?

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

The Canucks come to mind.....Jonathan Lekkerimaki and Tom Wilander.......after that, who knows?

I personally dont think either are gamebreaking, and likewise I think the Canucks depth is underrated, especially on defense.

 

[archangel2]

Most teams would have the game breaker in the line up

 

[Soundgarden]

Nashville has Kemell, Svechkov, L'Hereux, Molendyk, Wood, Edstrom, Schaefer, Surin as 1st round talent, take that how you will.

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

This pretty much screams Colorado.

Ritchie is one of the best drafted prospects in the league. But after that for the Avs, it's a barren wasteland. Maybe a few fairly unknowns, like Nabokov and Gulyayev...

But otherwise pretty close to nothing.