monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Team should get the full PP chance even if it rolls past 60 regulation minutes. | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Team should get the full PP chance even if it rolls past 60 regulation minutes.

Dynamite Time

Where Is My Mind?
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
3,881
Likes
2,082
Location
Austin, TX
Just watched Utah win 2-1 over SJ but there was a double minor high sticking call late to Utah; SJ wasn’t able to score in regulation but had 3 minutes+ of PP time lost.

I know there’s been threads on this before but not going to find it with the site updating.

I think if a team down and gets a late PP like this they should get the opportunity to run their full PP even if it runs a bit after 60 minutes. Of course if they take a penalty or the shorthanded team scores then it’s game over.

Your take.
 
Last edited:
I can see where you are coming from, but it wouldn't make sense overall. Teams would probably try some unscrupulous shit to get a penalty called with only a a couple seconds left and, if they do score, would invalidate the full 60 minute effort to win from the other team. Seems like it would be against the "spirit of the game", so to speak. I can't imagine how controversial something like this would be also if it decided playoff standings, series win, or even a cup win.
 
Nah. But if a team gets less than half of the PP because, say, there's only 8 seconds left in a 5-2 game, I'd be ok with not counting that as a PP on their team stats unless they score.
 
Just watched Utah win 2-1 over SJ but there was a double minor high sticking call late to Utah; SJ wasn’t able to score in regulation but had 3 minutes+ of PP time lost.

I know there’s been threads on this before but not going to find it with the site updating.

I think if a team down/or tied gets a late PP like this they should get the opportunity to run their full PP even if it runs a bit after 60 minutes. Of course if they take a penalty or the shorthanded team scores then it’s game over.

Your take.

This take is even worse than the site redesign.
 
I can see where you are coming from, but it wouldn't make sense overall. Teams would probably try some unscrupulous shit to get a penalty called with only a a couple seconds left and, if they do score, would invalidate the full 60 minute effort to win from the other team. Seems like it would be against the "spirit of the game", so to speak. I can't imagine how controversial something like this would be also if it decided playoff standings, series win, or even a cup win.
I can also agree with that because I could see “late diving” becoming a really stupid issue that puts even more questions on the referee’s and the game itself.

A blatant high stick or egregious dirty play late is what I was thinking of but I could see how it could become more of a problem in the game.
 
I can see where you are coming from, but it wouldn't make sense overall. Teams would probably try some unscrupulous shit to get a penalty called with only a a couple seconds left and, if they do score, would invalidate the full 60 minute effort to win from the other team. Seems like it would be against the "spirit of the game", so to speak. I can't imagine how controversial something like this would be also if it decided playoff standings, series win, or even a cup win.

What if the idea incorporates a penalty shot instead of adding weird time to the end of the game?
 
Rarely can one singular concept, one solitary kernel of human so-called inspiration, go so completely against both god and science.
 
What if the idea incorporates a penalty shot instead of adding weird time to the end of the game?
Not a bad idea either. Leading team takes a blatant double minor or a 5 minute major penalty (not a 2 minute minor) and the team down doesn’t get to run half of it when the 60 minutes end they get that chance.
 
What if the idea incorporates a penalty shot instead of adding weird time to the end of the game?

It solves a little bit of the issue, but it still doesn't really solve the possible diving or fishing for penalties plays that could end up with someone really hurt.
 
Just watched Utah win 2-1 over SJ but there was a double minor high sticking call late to Utah; SJ wasn’t able to score in regulation but had 3 minutes+ of PP time lost.

I know there’s been threads on this before but not going to find it with the site updating.

I think if a team down/or tied gets a late PP like this they should get the opportunity to run their full PP even if it runs a bit after 60 minutes. Of course if they take a penalty or the shorthanded team scores then it’s game over.

Your take.
It sucks but I don’t see a way to right the wrong you’re describing that doesn’t just create more potential problems.

I do think if there is a “palpably unfair act” as time is running out, like the defending team tackling a player or flipping the goal over to prevent a scoring chance, a penalty shot or even a goal should be awarded, depending on the circumstances. But I’m pretty sure the officials are already empowered to do that.
 
It sucks but I don’t see a way to right the wrong you’re describing that doesn’t just create more potential problems.

I do think if there is a “palpably unfair act” as time is running out, like the defending team tackling a player or flipping the goal over to prevent a scoring chance, a penalty shot or even a goal should be awarded, depending on the circumstances. But I’m pretty sure the officials are already empowered to do that.
I believe they are as well on those circumstances but I was looking at very late double minor/major penalty calls being exposed and the defending team having to fight it off; if they take one.
 
Powerplays are way less exciting than even-strength hockey. If you're looking to extend time, more powerplay time is not more fun or more competitively interesting.

If San Jose wanted more powerplay time, they should have drawn that penalty sooner.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->