- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,532
- 29,791
Team officially unveils new name - Utah Mammoth
- Thread starter CBJWerenski8
- Start date
red devil
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2004
- 10,140
- 31,308
Freakshow
Arizona Coyotes
Llewzaher
Registered User
I don’t mind the logo …I think they could have done better, but I don’t mind it … I just don’t like the kit… I thought it was ok for having to put something together in 5 months or so … but this just seems lazy …. It doesn’t ring NHL to me.. hopefully it grows on me
Mosby
Tusks Up
- Feb 16, 2012
- 23,446
- 20,201
Not a great name. Plural Mammoths, Outlaws, Coyotes, Mountaineers, pretty much any pluralized animal would have been better choices. The singular thing is just weird.
Ah the furry community in Utah rejoices! They have a furry elephant mascot to help them out of the shadows
ArizonaCoyotes19
Registered User
I'm just glad the name is out and we can fully focus on the on ice product.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 14,301
- 12,963
Stole this from James Duthie:
Its really too bad Jason Woolley is retired.
Its really too bad Jason Woolley is retired.
Stanley Thermos
Registered User
I like the branding better than at least half of the NHL. Specifically, I like some of the alternate logos. And the Utah-specific branding stands apart from any other Utah branding. Overall, it’s good enough for me, and some of it I actually like (logos with the tusk and hockey stick).
DethOfDragnz
Registered User
I don't like it. Mammoths are basically just elephants. Elephants are stereotyped as slow lazy animals. They are not cool like Panthers, Sabretooth Tigers, Sharks, other fast predatory like animals that make for cool logos for a sports team. Also I hate the logo. It looks like it was made in 10 seconds in AI. It looks like a colouring book cut out. If you are going to pick a animal as the logo for your team at least put some details into the logo/artwork. The more simple it is the more it looks like a child could have made it for their art class, the more lame it is. Also wish they didn't use baby blue colours. That is already seattles colours. I like when clubs come up with their own unique colours for their sports clubs.
Not a fan of the not ending with s team names. (I am ok with Lightening I guess). The Logo wordmarks and colours are great though.
Jormungandr
Registered User
No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
Feel like this feature of the logo should be more prominent.
Dirty Old Man
Extinct Elephant Fan
So our biggest rival should now be the Nashville Predators, in the Extinct Animal Logo Division (and if we ever discover remains of a colossal octopus, add Seattle as well)
We're even in the same division as Nashville! I like it.
Still getting the hang of being in the Central Division... it's vaguely similar to when the Rams relocated from St. Louis to Los Angeles. Took me a few years to properly hate them on the principle of the matter for being an LA team. The Cardinals' playoff loss to them I think is what sealed it.
Once we reach the playoffs and presumably face off in the first round against another team from the Central, that'll probably do it for me in hockey as well.
Arizonatah
Registered User
Meh. Don't love it, don't hate it. It's just fine. Kind of figured they wouldn't change the jersey but I wanted more creativity in the logo.
Edit: Is this the logo they used in the poll months ago that we all wrote off as Clipart? Seems a lot like what I remember.
Edit: Is this the logo they used in the poll months ago that we all wrote off as Clipart? Seems a lot like what I remember.
Last edited:
TheLegend
#TusksUp
- Aug 19, 2006
- 610
- 64
ROLLT1DE
Roll Damn Tide
Love the name. Kinda wish they had brown uniforms though. Feel like its more fitting.
TheLegend
#TusksUp
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5 (47 Viewers)- Latest: Cosmix
-
