DownGoesMcDavid
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 5,281
- 4,064
Percentage wise from Finnish posters...what would you give Ollie Juolevis as his chance to make the team...
Thanks
Thanks
If they intend to use MiG as a centre, then yeah, it is a combination worth considering. Another option could be to use Palola instead of Pesonen, because then the unit would have the same dynamic as that old Rajala - Granlund - Pulkkinen -line, which was one of the most lethal junior hockey combinations of its time.I didnt read yet if someone has mentioned here. But there is history between Rajala and Granlund and Granlund with Pesonen so Rajala-Granlund-Pesonen could be a solid line.
I really don't know, maybe 60? Hard to say what Marjamäki thinks about him.Percentage wise from Finnish posters...what would you give Ollie Juolevis as his chance to make the team...
Thanks
Finland doesn't have an overflow of offensive d-men, especially among the older guard so I think he has a good chancePercentage wise from Finnish posters...what would you give Ollie Juolevis as his chance to make the team...
Thanks
Vesalainen was impressive vs. HIFK but has been really underwhelming in the finals. As of right now, I see no chance Marjamäki picks him directly to the team, even as an extra. In fact, his odds of making it as a hang-around are even worse, since it would mean snubbing some guys who have been quite good on the camp, but don't really have room in the active lineup, because there will be more established names in the final team.Sadly Vesalainen's stocks are going down. Points aren't everything but he really needs to produce more points to convince Marjamäki. His season overall has been good though but is he tired or something since he played the U20 too? My feeling is that he is.
I'd personally take a chance on Vesalainen regardless but I got a feeling that Marjamäki won't select him. Maybe he could be a joker card that starts outside of the playing roster. In this case summer practice might be more worth it for Vesalainen so he doesn't end up being like Puljujärvi that one time. Hopefully he scores couple goals tomorrow and helps Kärpät seal the deal for a better chance at direct sport in the active roster.
If the Preds management figured they can afford that, I'd say Tolvanen would be in Finland already. But since he isn't, the only chance to get him seems to hinge on the Jets winning. If that happens, then Eeli will certainly join. Finland's management will surely leave roster leave spots open as long as there's a chance - no matter how slim - to get either Tolvanen or Laine.Tolvanen hasn't been mentioned in a while. How much reserve forwards do Nashville have and can they afford letting him go to Denmark?
It's way too early to say. Too many variables in play. Ask us on Sunday, when Finland has played its final preliminary game, and we can evaluate Juolevi's performance against other hopefuls.Percentage wise from Finnish posters...what would you give Ollie Juolevis as his chance to make the team...
Knock on wood, but right now it luckily looks kinda promising in regards to getting Rantanen and Koivu. Then we'd have a killer top-six, and Marjamäki can use the remaining euro pieces to build a solid third line around Suomela that should provide some secondary scoring. As for the fourth, we have Niemi and Anttila and I'm sure we can scrounge a suitable third piece from somewhere.
That line was indeed a staple - the only one - through the entire weekend, so Enlund isn't a bad bet. However, there may be other players Marjamäki may like for the role. He clearly digs Sallinen too, and we really can't discount Savinainen either. Finally, there's Peltola.Enlund-Niemi-Anttila seems to be locked 4th line and will probably start as a unit in WHC if EHT goes well. I believe it was a unit in some of the EHT games last weekend and also in the practices today and knowing how much Marjamäki likes Enlund. Niemi & Anttila seems like a no brainer link.
That line was indeed a staple - the only one - through the entire weekend, so Enlund isn't a bad bet. However, there may be other players Marjamäki may like for the role. He clearly digs Sallinen too, and we really can't discount Savinainen either. Finally, there's Peltola.
Sure, it's not a given that all of them are only vying for that one 4th line spot, they may well have their uses as balancing players in the upper lines too. However, if we really get Rantanen and Koivu, we don't have much room in top-six, and at least some of that more offensive-minded euro talent is probably going to make the cut as well, so some of those well-liked grinders may end up not making it.
Kapanen should be added to the team.
There are instances and situations in time and history, actually an abundance of examples in which too strong leadership and authority suppresses the rise of a new generation and its degees of freedom. And I would argue this case is a prime example of such an unwanted state of affairs realization of which would inhibit and hinder that crucial developmemt, change and creative expression waiting to be unlocked in these young up-coming players and also in the general outlook of the NT and its playing style. It is a structural, cultural and mental restriction and limitation a guy like Captain Finland with a wooden face and wooden voice would imply and impose on this team, its growth, chemistry and horizons. Simply, his shadow is too big and his voice too dry. In effect, he would discourage the ”undisciplined” creation of game on demand we neeed to move forward in the evolution of Team Finland and the game, in general.
It might sound paradoxical out of the box thinking but even better. Here we have a valid reason to leave these too iconic figures (larger than life: bigger than their real contiribution to the team and process, the ’contribution’ being rather harmful) out of this bubbling soup of young energy. It is a devlopment question, a confidence question, a responsibility (transfer) question, a question of cultural change, a question of empowerment and trust, of creative freedom and rise of new thinking and era.
Looking good boys!Our team doesn't look that bad anymore, offense at least.
Koivu - man... a great leader, yet this team needs no more vet leaders (Kukkonen will do) but rather sparkling juvenile energy and new faces for the people and Mr. Koivu with all honesty and all respect is a contrary opposition, anthithesis of anything and everything young, new, juvenile, fresh, energetic, spontaneous, creative, interesting... We need young generation excitement and enthusiasm, not these wornout serious faces whose mobility and speed (of feet, thought, speech) remind those of a dried out birch log. Koivu - an anchor and dead serious weight holding the team and its free expression back, down and out, a dry voice killing joy and creative anarchy on ice. A relic whose time in the NT is over, at least in these spring time festivities, carnevals celebrating the birth of new life and joyful youth! - And Koivu - oh man... Seriously, guys lol.