Ducks76
Registered User
- Oct 15, 2017
- 514
- 135
I ve the same thoughts by now.I allways was fan of finland in matches against Sweden in history of WC, but last few years i m opposit. Becouse Sweden players are much more patriotic then finnish.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d90/10d9034f00ff93d62711ca9ed1272c292dc0dd91" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
I ve the same thoughts by now.I allways was fan of finland in matches against Sweden in history of WC, but last few years i m opposit. Becouse Sweden players are much more patriotic then finnish.
Contract breach with IIHF transfer contract if true. Someone will get the axe for this tweet. The teams explicitly cannot ban players from National Team ice hockey.
I think it is in the CBA too.
Interesting view! But today you need a top team to win gold. In former times it was different,there you could exsist also with players from European Leagues(+ 3-4 NHL-Player) Of course, players like Kakko can prove themselves against NHL-Players. But waht use are super talents to Finland if they don t want to play for Finland in the future anyway.Disappointment ofc, but it is what it is. Next year with better roster.
This is a positive thing especially for those guys that have either breakout ssn or personal best ssn in Euro leagues (Kaski, Virtanen, Kakko) to show what they can do against actual NHLers and how they can handle the pace. And they will get better role than better case years.
We still might get Hintz, Heiskanen or Teräväinen from the NHL, but not a stacked team from there like Russia or USA or Sweden. Tho those guys have very good ssn under their belt aswell so they can be considered very good reinforcements.
I think this situation fits better to us Finns that we dont go sweeping every Latvias or Norways like 8-1 in round robins, no matter how euphoric it looks like. Almost every single gold medal tournament we have had struggles to overcome in route to that cup and more often as an underdogs when we rely more on teamwork.
Interesting view! But today you need a top team to win gold. In former times it was different,there you could exsist also with players from European Leagues(+ 3-4 NHL-Player) Of course, players like Kakko can prove themselves against NHL-Players. But waht use are super talents to Finland if they don t want to play for Finland in the future anyway.
Yes but Switzerland had Timo Meier,Niedereiter,Josi,Fiala etc in their team. I haven t much trust in miracles.And the schedule isn t very lucky for Suomi. First 3 games vs CAN,SVK and US.I think the pace of the game has changed drastically, but its not far away when we culd beat stacked Canada in 2014 WC quarterfinal with just couple of NHLers (that year tho Rinne was everything for us) and wasnt that far away from gold either vs Russia in WC final.
Miracles on ice still happens nowadays (Switzerland last year) so anything can happen, but it requires a strong teamspirit and commitment to ur own system. Possible unsung heroes and those high expectation guys has to play their A-game that it can happen. And even if we didnt have Rinne caliber gk this year we still can be effective underdogs especially w/ coaches like Jalonen and his staff is.
Luck and overperforming are required pretty much from everybody.
How do you know that Barkov didn’t decide to not go, and informed the IIHF of his decision, prior to the Panthers releasing the info? This is the captain of the team, you really think the team would go above him in regards to this, without first consulting with him?
How do you know that Barkov didn’t decide to not go, and informed the IIHF of his decision, prior to the Panthers releasing the info? This is the captain of the team, you really think the team would go above him in regards to this, without first consulting with him?
Lots of barking up the wrong tree here. This is the first time Barkov declines without a discernible injury (and it seems pretty obvious that he would have come if not pressured by the club). Määttä hasn't declined - at least not yet. Kotkaniemi's decision is actually understandable - a full NHL season can be really taxing for a guy who was conditioned to U18 and Liiga hockey. Armia and Lehkonen are both contractless.Lack of interest from Finnish players should be really worrisome for the staff. NHLers are less and less interested in joining : many decline several times (Barkov, Maatta), youngs guys not interested even though is a great opprtunity (Kotkaniemi, Borgstrom). Many never joined (Armia, Lehkonen)
The big news is that KHL players are also declining now.
What kind of fine or other sanction will be set for the panthers? They aren't allowed to stop players from world champs.
They can if he's injured which is what the statement says.
Lots of barking up the wrong tree here. This is the first time Barkov declines without a discernible injury (and it seems pretty obvious that he would have come if not pressured by the club). Määttä hasn't declined - at least not yet. Kotkaniemi's decision is actually understandable - a full NHL season can be really taxing for a guy who was conditioned to U18 and Liiga hockey. Armia and Lehkonen are both contractless.
Borgström is a bit of a mystery, especially since he DID initially express interest.
And the KHL players declining is arguably another issue that should be looked into more closely. It's especially puzzling since some guys who turned down the WHC invite don't mind answering EHT calls earlier in the season.
What kind of fine or other sanction will be set for the panthers? They aren't allowed to stop players from world champs.
team can stop players and do it all the time. Players have contracts and in this contract it is clearly stated what players can and can not do. Example. After Luc Bourdon of Vancouver died in the motorbike crash, many teams put in perversions banning stuff like that and other dangerous activities that could harm their ability to play. And playing hockey can be a dangerous activity.
Can you post a the rule where a team who has a valid contract can not stop a player from playing in any tournament?
Doesn't change the fact that they have valid reasons now, so it is a bit disingenuous to mention them as examples. Especially since the last year was the first time Armia declined with no discernible reason.Armia and Lehkonen had contracts in the last 2 years, I guess, but declined.
It's not. Counting the games in Europe, this is Dahlin's third full season of pro hockey, Kotkaniemi's second. It makes a massive difference in conditioning.Regarding Kotkaniemi, Dahlin is joining Sweden right? Same situation but different decisions.