Uncle Rotter
Registered User
Power play.BTW, how the heck does Pat Kane have 19 points, but is only a +1?
Power play.BTW, how the heck does Pat Kane have 19 points, but is only a +1?
I’m just wondering how Vlasic has looked in this tournament. I only saw the one game against Finland and he looked very poor in that game. How has he looked otherwise?
Have hardly even noticed Bailey and Pulock so far in the tournament.
Agreed on Beau, I thought he had been one of our better forwards out there, can't understand why they scratched him.
Barzal seems to have lots of pep, doesn't seem tired at all. He is coming off to fans as trying to do too much and a puck hog because the guys he is playing with never seem to ever be open so he can dish them the puck so he is hanging onto the puck more then he wants to, the kid is playing the same way he always does in the N.H.L.......................there just isn't anyone there to work with him to make something off his work.
They have got to find a guy that can play with him and get in positions to make his work pay off, we have not found the guy yet. The minute it happens if it does happen...................goals will start to go in with Barzal on the ice.
Thanks for the detailed response.
Maybe Pulock has been under utilized or misutilized?
Bailey should be golfing.
Barzal was a possession monster w us. He tends to do that circle the zone lap thing too much or overhandles. Eberle and Beau were money w him, they played off of him well; they were the shooters on his line obviously. But there are too many situations were he stickhandles himself into trouble.
Power play.
Most welcome.
Pulock just hasn't gotten a lot of ice time. You're right about barzal, he is doing that circle the zone thing...........there is just no one open, ever. he is holding onto the puck far more then he wants to, I wish we could find the right guy to compliment him and make plays off those pretty feeds we all know he can make. People have been saying the difference between him and mcd is I.Q, Barzal has a great i.q, of course his I.Q is not mcdavid level, whose is? but I watched him enough in the N.H.L this year to know Barzals I.Q is just fine, there just isn't anyone to pass to yet, they are never open or in any kind of favourable position for him. I so wish we could get a guy who knows how to work with him, a lot of our secondary scoring problems could be fixed right there.
And yeah....................Bailey ain't adding much to this team, more like nothing so far.
I'm inclined to go with sticking him back with Beau and ebs like you said.He’s gotta cut down the circling habit though; it’s predictable and I suspect he’s doing it more on the bigger ice.
I’d try Eberle and Beau w him; the line was our most dominant and reliable line all season. He needs a shooter that can play off of his creativity and keep up w him. Maybe Dubois?
I'm inclined to go with sticking him back with Beau and ebs like you said.
That's a good question, I am trying to remember who they did have him with today, I was so into just what team canada was doing I wasn't even paying attention at all to the lines,lolWho is he playing with now?
That's a good question, I am trying to remember who they did have him with today, I was so into just what team canada was doing I wasn't even paying attention at all to the lines,lol
It was all about beating the Russians for me today,not lines,lol
No problem man, but now you've got me scratching my beard here thinking................Goddamit, who was he playing with today anyway? lolAnyway, thanks for the info. Casually rooting for Team Canada.
Team U.S.A stands about the best chance they have ever had to take gold at this thing, I could see them winning it.I would imagine that the WCs mean a little more given that they aren’t sending NHLers to the Olympics.
Team USA obviously comes first, but Canada isn’t too far behind.
The roster was fine bear...........................the performance was not.I hope in next year Canada bring more strong roster
Maybe. But yours goalie not good.The roster was fine bear...........................the performance was not.