Weird that the Canucks get a sanctioned runoff at 11 OA, while our runoff at 6 OA was ignored.We're up next after the Canucks run off
Anyways, my pick will be Sale, with Dragicevic being a close consideration. I'd also be happy with Wood.
Weird that the Canucks get a sanctioned runoff at 11 OA, while our runoff at 6 OA was ignored.We're up next after the Canucks run off
Our opinions don’t matter. Other fans pick it for us anyways.Who's available?? Should we get a new thread for this with a new poll with options?
What a joke comment. Can you go back to your own little echo chamber, please? Unless you think you're smarter than all of the NHL GM's who are high on all 3 of these guys. Not a single one to my knowledge has talked about Leonard having limited upside, or Reinbacher having 1D upside.Leonard I don’t think would be a great fit, he has limited upside in my opinion, as does Dvorsky meanwhile Reinbacher has #1 D upside in My opinion. If you’re going Dvorsky to get a good two way centre Nate Danielson is probably the better of the two also. Doesn’t make too much sense to me.
#1 Defenders are more valuable than top-6 wingers, that’s what I think Reinbacher has compared to Leonard.What a joke comment. Can you go back to your own little echo chamber, please? Unless you think you're smarter than all of the NHL GM's who are high on all 3 of these guys. Not a single one to my knowledge has talked about Leonard having limited upside, or Reinbacher having 1D upside.
More importantly you're not a fan of the team and you're not welcome here.
And you’re wrong. Which is ok. It happens to all of us sometimes.#1 Defenders are more valuable than top-6 wingers, that’s what I think Reinbacher has compared to Leonard.
Dvorksy I could stomach at 6 more but even then, Reinbacher scored more than Dvorsky in a better professional league, as a defender.
Wrong about what? That top-6 wingers are more valuable than #1 defenders?And you’re wrong. Which is ok. It happens to all of us sometimes.
I bolded it for ya buddy.Wrong about what? That top-6 wingers are more valuable than #1 defenders?
I’d Like to see you make an argument for that statement
You can be ignorant all you want, fact of the matter is A #1 defender such as Miro Heiskanen is more valuable than a top-6 winger such as Jesper Bratt.I bolded it for ya buddy.
You’re framing your incorrect appraisal of these two prospects with a false equivalence. Which is a logical fallacy and not an actual argument.
Is Reinbacher a #1D? Dvorsky could go as high as 5.Wrong about what? That top-6 wingers are more valuable than #1 defenders?
I’d Like to see you make an argument for that statement
It’s amusing that you accuse me of ignorance after inviting a debate, when it seems your idea of an argument is just to pile up logical fallacies like ad hominem and false equivalence.You can be ignorant all you want, fact of the matter is A #1 defender such as Miro Heiskanen is more valuable than a top-6 winger such as Jesper Bratt.
Who Do you think should go at #6?
Bob McKenzie recently polled head scouts from 10 NHL teams. He compiled their rankings and published them on lottery day. Those NHL head scouts had Dvorsky 6th, Leonard 7th and Benson 8th, on average. Any of the three would be a great fit for us. As would Michkov, who averaged out to 5th.Is Reinbacher a #1D? Dvorsky could go as high as 5.
I think he has the potential to be, yes he has already played against men and with a great degree of success.Is Reinbacher a #1D? Dvorsky could go as high as 5.
I’m accusing you of ignorance because you didn’t read my post, it seems.It’s amusing that you accuse me of ignorance after inviting a debate, when it seems your idea of an argument is just to pile up logical fallacies like ad hominem and false equivalence.
Like quite a few actual NHL scouts, I’m of the opinion that David Reinbacher would be a reach at 6th overall, and there are forwards likely to be available at that spot that project better.
Appreciate this, I believe Reinbacher wasn’t ranked on the first rendition of Bob’s list, finished 20th in the mid season list and now shows up at 10th. Shows upward progression throughout the season, which is always a good sign when it comes to NHL prospects.Bob McKenzie recently polled head scouts from 10 NHL teams. He compiled their rankings and published them on lottery day. Those NHL head scouts had Dvorsky 6th, Leonard 7th and Benson 8th, on average. Any of the three would be a great fit for us. As would Michkov, who averaged out to 5th.
Reinbacher, on the other hand, was ranked 10th, on average for this poll.
@CraigsButton, you can read all about it here:
Plenty of intrigue after Connor Bedard in Bob McKenzie's NHL Draft Lottery Edition ranking | TSN
There is no doubt whatsoever who will be taken No. 1 overall in the talent-laden 2023 NHL Draft. Beyond that, though, at Nos. 2 through 5? Check out TSN Hockey Insider Bob McKenzie's Top 12 Lottery Edition Draft Ranking.www.tsn.ca
Reinbacher in the mix for me on my list with Dvorsky, Bensen, Leonard, and Sandin Pellika. I will trust our scouts with whomever they decide is our guy. Michkov is the guy i want to be honestI think he has the potential to be, yes he has already played against men and with a great degree of success.
And I agree, Montreal’s selection is up in the air reports vary from Reinbacher, to Dvorsky to Smith.
I’m accusing you of ignorance because you didn’t read my post, it seems.
Reinbacher scored more points than A top forward prospect (Dvorsky), who played in a lesser league. I think that’s reason enough to think that Reinbacher projects better.
Appreciate this, I believe Reinbacher wasn’t ranked on the first rendition of Bob’s list, finished 20th in the mid season list and now shows up at 10th. Shows upward progression throughout the season, which is always a good sign when it comes to NHL prospects.
Can’t wait to see what his final rankings say. I’d probably have Reinbacher around 7 or 8 myself, which is right around the range of this #6 selection.
This is foolish. You must be new to following NHL drafts if you think 17 year old point totals tell the story of NHL projection. Ten years ago, Nic Petan doubled Ryan Hartman’s point totals in their CHL draft eligible seasons. Should Petan have been drafted first? You don’t need to go back a decade. You can find many such examples in every single draft class.I’m accusing you of ignorance because you didn’t read my post, it seems.
Reinbacher scored more points than A top forward prospect (Dvorsky), who played in a lesser league. I think that’s reason enough to think that Reinbacher projects better.
True. He could jump higher than 10th in the final poll. But not if you listen to the 4 anonymous NHL scouts that Thomas Drance just recently interviewed. They all seem to think that Reinbacher is a reach at 10th overall.Appreciate this, I believe Reinbacher wasn’t ranked on the first rendition of Bob’s list, finished 20th in the mid season list and now shows up at 10th. Shows upward progression throughout the season, which is always a good sign when it comes to NHL prospects.
Can’t wait to see what his final rankings say. I’d probably have Reinbacher around 7 or 8 myself, which is right around the range of this #6 selection.
I really like a bunch of the defenseman projected to go 20-50.I said the same about Reinbacher.
If Reinbacher was a 2024 draft eligible player, he likely isn’t in the top 5 defenseman taken.
Get two great forwards and move along. Fill up on D prospects in later rounds. Next years first round selection is very likely a defensive prospect, and one that’s better than Reinbacher
This. Opening night at Fiesta Arena and Michkov, But, Simashev and Duda debut. Let's get Yurov in a deal with the Wild while we're at it.Michkov scares me but if we pick him, I would assume BA and co. did their due diligence and are confident in getting him here(in 3 years). If thats the case I also would want Simashev and But later in the first. Just go all in on the Russians (and save on Duolingo).