Sweden was completely outplayed by Finland, a national team they had consistently beaten since the U16 level. Finland looked significantly more technical, had better play, and created more chances. A trend in Swedish national teams is the focus on early-born players. For example, Finland had seven U16 players, while Sweden had none. Sweden wins in the younger years, but as players develop, other nations catch up and surpass them, which is evident in the World Juniors. Hockey is about patience and allowing players to grow into their roles. This is a major issue in Swedish hockey today.
Additionally, almost all players in the Swedish U18 national team play in J20 and have been involved with senior teams, fueling the debate about rushing development and skipping crucial steps in player education.
Looking at the performance against Finland, at least ten players would need to be replaced before a World Championship. Several players struggled with the pace and game sense. There are significant deficiencies in stickhandling, mainly due to the higher speed of play. The fact that Paananen hasn’t tested more players during the season could prove to be a costly mistake ahead of the U18 World Championship. However, judging by the tournaments played under Paananen’s leadership, it seems unlikely that he is a coach who will make major changes. I predict that the U18 World Championship will be a tough challenge for the Swedish national team.
The entire 2007-born group has far more technical players than those who have been in the national team so far, making it a strong age group. The question is whether they will get a chance.