- Sep 8, 2004
- 15,026
- 2,199
The NHL really needs to arts the tax advantages some teams have with a fixed cap.
I always knew the no/low tax states have a huge advantage, but, I let AI spell it out directly for the Leafs vs Panthers in this years playoffs (exclusively)
We are looking at an advantage of ~45 million... imagine our depth with that much extra $$. We would have been able y to fit Marchand and Jones with full cap hits with ease and upgrade every depth player as well. So, we are a little hard on our guys since the ice is tilled WAY to the south!!
Accounting for the tax discrepancy, the Florida Panthers’ effective cap hit in Toronto’s tax environment was ~$132.9M, or $44.9M over the $88M cap, compared to the Leafs’
I always knew the no/low tax states have a huge advantage, but, I let AI spell it out directly for the Leafs vs Panthers in this years playoffs (exclusively)
We are looking at an advantage of ~45 million... imagine our depth with that much extra $$. We would have been able y to fit Marchand and Jones with full cap hits with ease and upgrade every depth player as well. So, we are a little hard on our guys since the ice is tilled WAY to the south!!
Accounting for the tax discrepancy, the Florida Panthers’ effective cap hit in Toronto’s tax environment was ~$132.9M, or $44.9M over the $88M cap, compared to the Leafs’