Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 33,341
- 36,572
IMO the Richards - Booth hit was much more vicious.
cause calling for 10-15 games is so much more reasonable of a take
I don’t see the head as main point of contact. I have more of an issue of him coming from his blindside. May be legal but it’s still a predatory hit.Blindside hits are legal.
This hit was illegal because the head was the main point of contact and such contact to the head was avoidable
Hockey is a violent sport.I don’t see the head as main point of contact. I have more of an issue of him coming from his blindside. May be legal but it’s still a predatory hit.
Wtf does torres have to do with this?It was a clown post, take the L and move on.
Sure but it’s not suppose to be dirtyHockey is a violent sport.
Torres was actually a head hunter that leaped into guysWtf does torres have to do with this?
He got suspended for 45 because he wouldnt stop kneeing players. Lol
Respectively,you can't get into the head of Jeanott to say for ceratin that the head was the intended target...I think he was looking to hit someone anyone and it happened to be Boeser that is his role...for Boeser's sake I hope he's not feeling the effects of a concussionLate, blindside, head was targeted.
Absolute bonehead play by an absolute bonehead.
Well, to each his own. If you can put a big hit on a key player legally and take them out of the game, it's not dirty at all. It's fair play.Sure but it’s not suppose to be dirty
Sure but that wasn’t legalWell, to each his own. If you can put a big hit on a key player legally and take them out of the game, it's not dirty at all. It's fair play.