Louie the Blue
Because it's a trap
- Jul 27, 2010
- 4,853
- 3,182
How’d that turn out for Florida?Remember when people said they wouldn't trade him in a package for Matthew Tkachuk. Good times!
How’d that turn out for Florida?Remember when people said they wouldn't trade him in a package for Matthew Tkachuk. Good times!
They were following the advice of @BleedBlue14 for the tank!
Thought that was brown? Kyrou doesn’t appear to have been on ice for any goals against.4th Yotes goal where Kyrou did nothing but watch. Smh
I think he was being sarcastic with the Kyrou comments because people always blame KyrouThought that was brown? Kyrou doesn’t appear to have been on ice for any goals against.
Ah. Thanks.I think he was being sarcastic with the Kyrou comments because people always blame Kyrou
That's the joke lolThought that was brown? Kyrou doesn’t appear to have been on ice for any goals against.
If it makes you feel better, I didn’t get it either.Ah. Thanks.
So many folks blaming Kyrou for everything hard to keep track of when it’s in jest!That's the joke lol
How’d that turn out for Florida?
Florida made smart move here. This years team really misses weegar, but I’d much rather be team that paid the 25 year old superstar than the team that committed $140mm to 2 30 year olds.To be fair, blaming Tkachuk for Florida is a reach. The guy has 81 points in 62 games. The problem there is the goaltending has been blah and the depth around him hasn't produced, specifically on the defensive side. Ekblad took a massive step down this year having to cover for them losing Weeger.
That's been one of those weird trades in which both sides looked smart at the time but the outcome hasn't been great either way.
How’d that turn out for Florida?
I'd rather have Tkachuk than Kyrou but it would be better if we could have them both! Although we couldn't beat that package Florida gave.If you're judging the trade solely on this season, maybe not that well, but I still think Florida got the best of that deal long term. They're probably happy to have the guy with 81 points in 62 games going forward. It's not like Calgary is tearing it up with Huberdeau and Weegar, and Hubie's contract might be the worst in the league in the not-so-distant future.
Tkachuk will likely always be a more impactful player than Kyrou, though I realize the challenges of making that trade were probably too big for Armstrong to overcome. I just found it interesting that some Blues fans would rather have Kyrou than Tkachuk, because it's not even close in my mind.
4th Yotes goal where Kyrou did nothing but watch. Smh
Remember when people said they wouldn't trade him in a package for Matthew Tkachuk. Good times!
To be fair, blaming Tkachuk for Florida is a reach. The guy has 81 points in 62 games. The problem there is the goaltending has been blah and the depth around him hasn't produced, specifically on the defensive side. Ekblad took a massive step down this year having to cover for them losing Weeger.
That's been one of those weird trades in which both sides looked smart at the time but the outcome hasn't been great either way.
Long-term I think Tkachuk will play at a high level and will be worth his contract. I also think the assets Florida gave up hurt the team now and in the future(which has more to do with Bobrovsky’s contract).If you're judging the trade solely on this season, maybe not that well, but I still think Florida got the best of that deal long term. They're probably happy to have the guy with 81 points in 62 games going forward. It's not like Calgary is tearing it up with Huberdeau and Weegar, and Hubie's contract might be the worst in the league in the not-so-distant future.
Tkachuk will likely always be a more impactful player than Kyrou, though I realize the challenges of making that trade were probably too big for Armstrong to overcome. I just found it interesting that some Blues fans would rather have Kyrou than Tkachuk, because it's not even close in my mind.
If it’s a deliberate early jinx thread, can doing THAT function as a reverse jinx and lead to wins?
yep, glad to say i was not 1 of themRemember when people said they wouldn't trade him in a package for Matthew Tkachuk. Good times!
81pts, +17How’d that turn out for Florida?
Didn’t say he was Florida’s problem. The assets Florida gave up within a salary capped league and not being able to properly replace them for depth and performance purposes is, however.81pts, +17
MT is not florida's problem. jordan kyrou being a bum defensively is one of ours however.
Spenser Knight hasn't been nearly as good as I thought he should be. Pegged him for an elite goaltender. I was bummed that we didn't land him in the draft but now......To be fair, blaming Tkachuk for Florida is a reach. The guy has 81 points in 62 games. The problem there is the goaltending has been blah and the depth around him hasn't produced, specifically on the defensive side. Ekblad took a massive step down this year having to cover for them losing Weeger.
That's been one of those weird trades in which both sides looked smart at the time but the outcome hasn't been great either way.