It just always puzzled me — the magic we do with low round picks and undrafted players. We can develop them fine … but not the high ones? You can’t make this up.
Because we inexplicably give those players ice time.
The Dan Girardis, Ryan Callahans, Jesper Fasts, etc. Now, Lundqvist was lightning in a bottle, but talking about the rest. But usually what happens is a replacement level player comes along due to injury (see Bickel, Stu), gets thrown into a role where they're expected to be completely awful, and exceeds the expectations that were unreasonably low to begin with. Bonus points if TUFFNESS or #GRIT is involved. That then prompts the coaching staff (no matter who it is) to consider that player a serious tryhard who merits a look further up in the lineup based on their superior effort, which keeps them there even as the results suffer.
On the other hand, the top prospects, with their burdensome expectations, never produce enough to justify it, which merits demotion to the AHL, the 4th line, or the press box. Of course, it's hard to produce NHL statistics in any of those places, so that becomes evidence of their lack of effort, which perpetuates the cycle.
TLDR/ expectations + skill = bad disappointment, no expectations = pleasant surprise and "superior effort" was the method to get it.
It's a franchise mentality.