JasonRoseEh
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2018
- 2,933
- 2,347
This isn't remotely true and it isn't close.Tampa are cup favourites and it's not close
This isn't remotely true and it isn't close.Tampa are cup favourites and it's not close
I mentioned them as a team that was very good but not elite because they didn't win. San Jose was a team full of guys who don't perform in the playoffs. Carolina isn't really a team that won recently. They had a goalie who completely played out of his mind and is a very rare example. They also had a 100 point center.San Jose and Vancouver in recent years are elite teams that didn't win.
Carolina is a meh team that won the cup recently.
No idea why you mentioned the leafs.
It happens more than you think though.
Huh? Did the Caps not just win the cup?I think the playoffs are pretty luck based to be honest. Good teams lose in the playoffs all the time. Look at Washington or the Sharks for example
No?How is it not? At the start of every season each team is competing in a field of 31. That gives you a 1 in 31 chance of winning, no?
yeah, but they lost in the second round with an even stronger teamHuh? Did the Caps not just win the cup?
They didn't win the cups, yes an .942% save percentage goaltender would give a chance to any team to win series.Did you watch any hockey last year? Vegas says **** your stats and chemistry.
So, they're like every other team in the league then?Honestly I think they are very beatable in a playoff series. Not by every team but I think that the top end ones or ones who can play them properly it won't be easy, but they are beatable.
However in the regular season when they just keep rolling they are in a league of their own.
This thread is for the best roster, not the scariest.The post-lockout roster that still blows me away the most didn't even win the Cup.
2006-07 Sabres.
I guess their defense is so-so for a contender, but they had the deepest forward corps I've ever seen.This thread is for the best roster, not the scariest.
Wait why does that roster blow you away?
Enjoy the same story for your beloved Leafs.Yup lol. Either way the point stands. The Sharks did all the same things and never won anything.
I guess their defense is so-so for a contender,
yeah, but they lost in the second round with an even stronger team
you shouldn't be surprised if any team gets knocked out in the first round. Even the best teams have like a 35-40% chance of losingMatch ups and play style. It's not all about who has the best team on paper
This is why I wouldn't be surprised if the leafs got knocked out in the first round again
Lots of points on paper, But don't have the style to match up against other teams
YesIs Tampa Bay the best roster in the Cap era and possibly beyond that?
I believe they definitely have a case for it.
Breaking down the team:
Kucherov: a top 3 winger in the league, no one will argue that. He's consistent and has tons of talent. 90-100 points
Stamkos: a top sniper, elite talent, has regained form after a hard run of injuries, and is a 80-90 point guy.
Point: an absolute steal for the lightning. Point keeps proving his value over and over and has proven many people wrong. Loves clutch moments which makes him a fan favorite. 70-80 point player.
Hedman: Norris contender every year.
Mcdonagh: was considered a true #1 in his new york days and is back to form now, dominating games.
Vasi: Top 3 goalie, vezina contender.
So far you have 6 elite players on the roster, most of which could easily contend for trophies in any given year.
On top of that though, you have a great compliment, with Stralman, Gourde, Johnson and Sergachev. These guys are all top 6 or top 4 players in the league.
We're 35 games in and Tampa already has a 8 point lead on 2nd, and their pacing for nearly 130 points, clearly on a level of their own.
And with the lightning planning on retaining Point, is this the best cap era team asembled?
I really this is a special group that isn't getting enough love.
you shouldn't be surprised if any team gets knocked out in the first round. Even the best teams have like a 35-40% chance of losing
I remember quite the defense group for that team.
Campbell, Tallinder, Numminen, Lydman was quite the top 4, having someone like Spacek has your number 6 show how deep they were at defense. At significantly older Spacer was the #3 on the Habs when he got traded there, Lydman was #2 when he arrive on the Ducks year's later.
They simply had most of them injured during the playoff.
If you're team is built right you should win 70 percent time. That's why they do a best out of 7
Sound about right if you have a team that win 60% of is game against any opponent has .710 chance of winning a 4 of 7 series, 25% chance of winning 4 in row.
I can see Kuch eventually winning an Art Ross.
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not
Because honestly I didn't bother the math lol I was just saying the better team should win 7 out of 10 times
But I guess it could be 6