Value of: Tage Thompson

Mattilaus

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
7,901
6,672
Beyond the Wall
I would happily pay our top F prospect and two firsts from the Jets to get Tage.

Lambert/Yager/Chibrikov + 2025 First + 2026 First (top 5 protected)

I'd even throw in Stanley so you can keep a token tall guy in the lineup after trading Tage.
Okay you have said why you would do that. But now answer why the Sabres would? They aren't looking to sell for a rebuild. They are looking to improve. Why would we trade our 1 C for a couple picks and a prospect that we already have in spades in Rochester?
 

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,752
6,074
Alexandria, VA
lol 7-8 pieces calm down
For a healthy Richel with 4 yrs of term from Vegas likely would have cost

Original deal
Tuch
Krebs
1st in 22
2nd in 23*
......Added on.....
5. another roster player on team or near ready AHLer on ELC
6. Another decent prospect not yet on ELC or just started it
7. A 2nd in 26*
* one of these becomes a 1st if vegas wins the cup between then and 2026 bit not a year they hold the draft
8. Another item depending on what 5 and 6 were
 

MagnumForce2

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
4,346
980
Okay you have said why you would do that. But now answer why the Sabres would? They aren't looking to sell for a rebuild. They are looking to improve. Why would we trade our 1 C for a couple picks and a prospect that we already have in spades in Rochester?
Prolonging the rebuild
 

Heffyhoof

So happy to be glad to be pleased to meet you.
Jan 17, 2016
1,892
3,177
It's rough having teams try to poach your good players for a collection of lesser pieces with no consideration for your team's situation and needs. I feel for you Buffalo fans.

Like I get why people would try this with Cozens. He's underperforming, his contract is pretty risky. Maybe you can buy low and convince the Sabres to cut their losses. Thompson though? They're not going to accept the trade unless it's crazy.

Habs fans, start your proposals with Suzuki and a top 3 protected first, then add another asset you consider untouchable, then maybe, just maybe, you'll get the attention of Sabres fans.
And people call Habs fans delusional? Suzuki>Thompson.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,609
3,935
Milton
The sabres problem is they have let go of good players too early like Eichel, Reinhart, O'Reilly, etc. They need to just keep Thompson.
 

domiwroze

Registered User
Nov 14, 2014
5,791
8,061
As much as I would love to see a 1-2 punch of Suzuki - Thompson with the Habs, there's no way Buffalo makes any trade involving Tage. It just doesn't make any sense and I can understand why they would ask 2x time his actual trade value and more.

Unless they rebuild and I doubt they will unless they are still out of the playoffs in 3years.

If Tage is moving, it's to make Buffalo better right now, not the other way around.
They should actually think about moving their prospect or young players that are trying to make it for good Vets instead. Rosen, Strbak, Helenius, Kulich could get some nice Vet addition to the very young Sabres line-up
 

Heffyhoof

So happy to be glad to be pleased to meet you.
Jan 17, 2016
1,892
3,177
Seems pretty reasonable take considering Suzuki will never come close to Thompsons 47-47 season ever.
I would easily bet on Suzuki surpassing that point total and breaching 40 goals before Tage ever comes close to that again. Also good job ignoring that it was also a top 3 protected 1st rounder and one of Montreal's top prospects/even younger than Suzuki players.

I'd happily send out Suzuki against Tage, but would be reluctant to do the opposite. 6-1?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad