That comparison is pretty absurd. First, Knuble's shooting percentage was pretty consistent his whole career. More opportunity, more total production. He just got put in far better situations as he aged. Not to mention dude was a net front grinder, not a sniper, shooter from distance.
The point is not whether players can be successful late in their career. Anything is possible, maybe Knuble is the Barry Bonds of hockey players, getting better in his thirties...
But on average, players don't massively improve their shooting accuracy in their twenties.
It's not even a point about Tage. I think I have repeated this a couple times, but I think it's completely possible that he will be fine with a reboot season in Rochester.
I can't believe I'm reading about Mike Knuble of all people.