Bruins4Lifer
Registered User
I don't really care if Sweeney stays or goes, but I don't have quite the same concern he's a danger to the future of the team right now like I did when Chiarelli was here his last year or so. He arguably/probably does deserve to lose his job over them but Sweeney's most recent screwups (the Swayman and Lindholm deals) are two that I was onboard with, and seemed like the right/only move to make, at the time.I want to know why Sweeney deserves a chance now when Chiarelli didn't in 2015? My memory's not perfect, but I don't remember many banging the table to keep him then. Both only missed the playoffs in their first and most recent years. The prospect pool isn't better today than it was then. The core isn't better today than it was then. Chiarelli had at least won a Cup. And he was only a year removed from a President's trophy and two years removed from a Cup Final appearance, while Sweeney is two years removed from a President's trophy and six years removed from a Cup Final appearance. They both had their share of embarrassing decisions.
I was ready to see Chiarelli go then, just as I'm ready to see Sweeney go now. You can't just keep him because you're worried the next guy will be worse. That's an attitude that keeps bad organizations bad. I know what they have, and that person's simply just not good enough.
A lot of Chiarelli's last deals and signings seemed like bad ideas at at the time and were proven bad almost immediately. The Seguin deal stunk immediately. The Boychuck deal wasn't great, and then made worse when he turned around and gave those picks away for Brett Connolly. He re-signed old players to bad deals when he should have traded or walked away from them.