There was nothing very dirty about that. Come on.Clumsy or very dirty, either way obvious match/game penalty.
Sweden's PP has not impressed so wouldn't be surprised if Latvia scores instead.
There was nothing very dirty about that. Come on.Clumsy or very dirty, either way obvious match/game penalty.
Sweden's PP has not impressed so wouldn't be surprised if Latvia scores instead.
He just barely touched him with the stick, come on. He pushed him with his hand and the stick greased him a bit.Butt ending is by definition very dirty and a crystal clear 5+20. The intent I can't know, thus clumsy or very dirty depending on if intentional. Sliding the top hand down is not a good look, but who knows...
The butt end to the chest was enough to get him kicked out. The stick may have been jarred and the Swede got the butt end in the face. I doubt there was embellishment. The butt end to the chest wasn't very hard so if had played dead for that would it have been an act.Clumsy or very dirty, either way obvious match/game penalty.
Sweden's PP has not impressed so wouldn't be surprised if Latvia scores instead.
Yeah, using the butt end of the stick towards another player is the definition of: butt ending. Very dirty. (You don't even have to hit to be a game penalty, the act itself is by sliding the top hand down and aiming the top half is bad enough.)He just barely touched him with the stick, come on. He pushed him with his hand and the stick greased him a bit.
From the angles I saw I could agree, but maybe they saw the end of the stick hit Lindholm in his face on other pictures. Otherwise I dont understand the call.That legit might be the softest 5 and a game I have ever seen in my life.
Never said it wasn't a penalty by a rule book but pretending that he lost his teeth for a few minutes was also a clear embellishment.Yeah, using the butt end of the stick towards another player is the definition of: butt ending. Very dirty. (You don't even have to hit to be a game penalty, the act itself is by sliding the top hand down and aiming the top half is bad enough.)
Not sure what rule book you go by though.
This is just the wrong take. Come one.Butt ending is by definition very dirty and a crystal clear 5+20. The intent I can't know, thus clumsy or very dirty depending on if intentional. Sliding the top hand down is not a good look, but who knows...
By far.That legit might be the softest 5 and a game I have ever seen in my life.
Get real man.The butt end to the chest was enough to get him kicked out. The stick may have been jarred and the Swede got the butt end in the face. I doubt there was embellishment. The butt end to the chest wasn't very hard so if had played dead for that would it have been an act.
Absolutely stupid play. If you are going to butt end someone do it in a scrum of 4 or 5 players where you can hide it.
there was 2 situations, the first one was nothing special, but seconds later the latvian player used his stick as a weapon towards Lindholms headThis is just the wrong take. Come one.
It was a light glove shove, which happens in every single scrum in every game. The only difference is the Latvian player wasn't holding his stick right at the very end, and the butt end grazes Lindholm's chest/chin area. Lindholm goes down like he was shot and pretends to be injured on the bench, clutching his jaw, until the major is called, at which point he is miraculously fine. He literally is hiding his face so that the refs can't see that he is completely uninjured.
There was no intent. This wasn't even a butt-ending. It's horrendous call.
By far.
"clear embellishment", you do you. If you have said possible embellishment, sure. Guess you've never got hit by a stick in the face, nor the butt end of one.Never said it wasn't a penalty by a rule book but pretending that he lost his teeth for a few minutes was also a clear embellishment.
After 45 minutes there will be nobody to discuss that penalty, nobody will remember it.Butt ending is by definition very dirty and a crystal clear 5+20. The intent I can't know, thus clumsy or very dirty depending on if intentional. Sliding the top hand down is not a good look, but who knows...
I mean, if you want to completely live in a different reality, sure.there was 2 situations, the first one was nothing special, but seconds later the latvian player used his stick as a weapon towards Lindholms head
Because he wasn't hit by a stick, the stick greased his chin/face because the Latvian wasn't holding it well when he pushed him with his fist. There was literally nothing."clear embellishment", you do you. If you have said possible embellishment, sure. Guess you've never got hit by a stick in the face, nor the butt end of one.
A butt ending is *always* very dirty. Despite that, no, I don't believe there will be any suspension handed out.After 45 minutes there will be nobody to discuss that penalty, nobody will remember it.
Nothing about that was very dirty.