Someone using advanced statistics should know that you can't compare someone playing on the first line versus someone playing on the second line. 1st you cherry pick 5v5 stats, Why not actually compare orange to orange and compare them when they were both playing 1st line minutes? Is it this hard to understand?
I know he did really good as a first line player (I actually think he should be the first line center next year when Hughes come back. I know it won't happen though). I just want accurate advanced stats comparisons because those can be easily misleading if the parameters differs too much.
Advanced stats comparisons just doesn't work when the parameters differs from players to players. Hischier played most games on the 2nd line so
@Golden_Jet can't just compare his whole year to centers who played all years on the first line. That's not how it works. The usage of a second line center is different than a 1st line center. Thats all i want yet some peoples are hating for no reasons.
Nico as a 2nd line center :
Nico as 1st line center :
As I expected, Niko's stats aren't nearly as good as as a first liner than a 2nd liner. I knew that beforehand because in almost EVERY CASES ive seen, 2nd line players have inflated advanced statistics. But im happy to make
@Golden_Jet laugh with my facts.
But as you said, he played great as a first liner, produced a lot more, yet his advanced stats regressed. So what was it, was he better or worse as a 1st liner? Advanced statistics never tell the whole story. You need to mix them with classic statistics and actual eye test to have the full picture.