Splitting the finale in two was not a great idea. It was basically over 15 minutes into the episode when Rachel won immunity. It was pretty clear that nobody was going to beat her. I like Rachel as a winner although I do understand the comparison to winners like Mike and Ben. I think she's better than both though. She never had as big a social blunder like Mike during the auction and she didn't really solely on finding idols like Ben. Dee still remains the best player of the new era.
Overall, this season was solid. It was a step below the last two, but it was still fairly entertaining. Aside from the premiere, the pre-merge was great. I do think the post-merge was pretty bland, but Operation Italy and the first part of the finale were both great episodes.
In terms of my ranking of the new era seasons, I'd probably have it as...
45>46>47/42>41>44>43
42 and 45-47 are all good seasons, but I'm not a fan of the other three.
If another woman wins in Season 48 it might be time to wonder if the new format isn't creating a disadvantage to men. That's gonna be a 6-2 split since the New Era started and that's not a problem you can just gloss over.
From seasons 26-40 we had twelve male winners and only three female winners. I don't think it's a big deal to see more women start to win more and close the gap a bit. I don't really see anything specific about the new era format that's putting men at a disadvantage.
The final 3 stuff needs to go, Sue had 0 chance of winning and didn't deserve to be in the final.
Do you think we should have had a final two instead? If it was a final two, Sue would have been there no matter what. If Rachel won final immunity, she would have voted out Sam and if Sam won, he would have voted out Rachel. Final threes at least allow for the possibility of two good players making it to the end. Most final twos these days would just a decent player and a goat.