Honestly. I see Foxie turning into a top player in the league, and I think he already is one. I have him at 1A ahead of Kakko, and he's very much proven it at the national level. This guy's good. He's really good. Analytically speaking, he's elite. See there are at times consensus when the eye test will align with the common level analytics out there. Sometimes the hype from two segments of the hockey universe aligns to manifest itself beyond the squabbles.
What results is that the common interpretation of your known underlying variables and the eye test where we see the offensive plays, the defensive plays, and more importantly how the game flows all end up looking the same on both the spreadsheets and on screens and arenas.
So what does consensus among two segments have to do with it? Very simple... you only get said consensus when the player is an extreme outlier. That's how good Fox is, was, and will only get better.
What results is that the common interpretation of your known underlying variables and the eye test where we see the offensive plays, the defensive plays, and more importantly how the game flows all end up looking the same on both the spreadsheets and on screens and arenas.
So what does consensus among two segments have to do with it? Very simple... you only get said consensus when the player is an extreme outlier. That's how good Fox is, was, and will only get better.
