Randy Butternubs
Registurd User
I acquired Kobasew in NHL 04 or something like that. He had a 99/99 potential and ended up being a superstar for me.
That’s f***in amazing, broI acquired Kobasew in NHL 04 or something like that. He had a 99/99 potential and ended up being a superstar for me.
The issue isn't Beauvillier vs. Puljujarvi. Beauvillier is producing and is only a year older.I completely disagree on the third line. First of all, Sullivan is playing O'Connor with Malkin and Tomasino a lot now, so it's often Bunting-Lizotte-Beauvillier. Secondly, the third line looks way better with Puljujarvi on it. No. 18 provides an actual offensive threat. Beauvillier can finish but is otherwise brain dead so he needs someone to provide the offense for him. Lizotte is a decent player and I think he can help this team, but he should be the fourth-line center as you said. Our fourth line is pathetic right now. No reason for it when we have other players ready to step in.
But after three wins in a row, Sullivan will definitely not break up the forwards. He has no problem switching up the D or changing goaltenders, but those PKers are sacred.
Yes, I agree. It's the trickle-down effect. If Lizotte is centering the fourth line, then O'Connor could center both Beauvillier and Puljujarvi on the third. OR, O'Connor-Lizotte-Puljujarvi could be a decent third line, or even Bunting in place of O'Connor if they keep O'Connor on line 2. Beauvillier would give the fourth line a threat in that scenario.The issue isn't Beauvillier vs. Puljujarvi. Beauvillier is producing and is only a year older.
It's Puljujarvi vs. Nieto/Acciari/Hayes.
lol…didnt Watch…didn’t expect this either…hope he keeps it up
Shitty poster != shitposter.Shirey becoming a shitposter now. This is the darkest timeline.
The issue isn't Beauvillier vs. Puljujarvi. Beauvillier is producing and is only a year older.
It's Puljujarvi vs. Nieto/Acciari/Hayes.
Am I being harsh when I say that there was still a lot to dislike in this game? Ned stood on his head in the first. Calgary easily could have had 2 or more. Malkin was a turnover machine, easily could have led to many goals against, including one while the Pens were on the PP.
I like to reference the "Deserve-to-win-o-meter" website, and the Pens were actually only a 55/45 favorite to win based on how the game unfolded. I wouldn't let an unexpected flurry of goals and some good play by Ned fool me into thinking that this was a dominant win. It also helped that Calgary looked disinterested after the first period.
I try not to be a debbie downer, and obviously watching them peel off 3 consecutive Ws is nice to see. But I fear this is a mirage.
Their chances of keeping that up don't seem high given their schedule this week.i don't know if it's a mirage or not, but I do know that the Penguins have out-shot their opponents in 3-straight games, something that hasn't happened since approximately 2019
i agree, but they weren't even out-shooting crap teams earlier this year. If they're going to win games, I hope this is an actual positive trend that will continue. If it is a mirage, I hope they start losing again, and quick. We're climbing too high.Their chances of keeping that up don't seem high given their schedule this week.