Sudbury Wolves 2024-25 Season Thread, Part II

Wolfman Jack

Registered User
Jan 19, 2009
3,336
2,626
Puck was never covered, was loose the whole time. We can be upset with the call all we want. Fact is the game never should have got to that point. We stopped playing.
Just watched the replay with sound. The ref blew the whistle twice. First time he did he wasn't over the line. Watch it

WJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: cub

Voice from the North

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
1,041
607
The goal was reviewed because the off ice officials saw it as a goal as they do anytime a puck goes in unnoticed. They will buzz and call down to review it. After reviewing the play they determined the puck crossed before the whistle blew. As for pushing kwachuck in, the bottom of the pad was already across the line in the net before the puck went in.

That’s not what happened
 

cub

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
4,884
3,911
The goal was reviewed because the off ice officials saw it as a goal as they do anytime a puck goes in unnoticed. They will buzz and call down to review it. After reviewing the play they determined the puck crossed before the whistle blew. As for pushing kwachuck in, the bottom of the pad was already across the line in the net before the puck went in.

I just watched a few times ref blows the whistle even announcers thought ref whistle before the goal, also pushed his pad into the net, that's goalie interference.
 

djscooter

Registered User
Apr 19, 2005
3,260
3,419
Lesson to the wolves, if the goalie has the puck under him, just bowl over him and push him into the net.

Even the Colts twitter has videos of all their goals, except that one, wonder why.?
 

Voice from the North

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
1,041
607
I watched it happen, one ref was on the phone with the booth and called the ref who blew the whistle over to review it. Wilmont initially wanted nothing to do with a review.
I also watched the game on CHLtv. The whistle very clearly went before the puck went in the net. The video goal judge cant state that the puck went in before the whistle, they can only say the puck entered the net and then it’s up to the ref to decide. All he had to do was say he blew the whistle and it’s over. Williamson influenced that call
 
  • Like
Reactions: cub

agillarda

Registered User
Jan 3, 2024
306
244
that goal was totally influenced by Marty Williamson, Willmot told him he blew the whistle before the goal went in, Willmot was right there on top of the play, he was influenced by the coach.
Let's go through this again.

They ref rules initially no goal.
All the refs huddled by the box and without reviewing the play Wilmont again waived off the goal.
As that was happening the ref upstairs was calling down.
While Wilmont was having his conversation with Williamson the other ref was on the phone upstairs and Wilmont was called over and then they reviewed it.

I would love to see the overhead view with the sounds of the whistle though.
 

cub

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
4,884
3,911
Let's go through this again.

They ref rules initially no goal.
All the refs huddled by the box and without reviewing the play Wilmont again waived off the goal.
As that was happening the ref upstairs was calling down.
While Wilmont was having his conversation with Williamson the other ref was on the phone upstairs and Wilmont was called over and then they reviewed it.
I hear the whistle go off before the puck goes in, not sure how you don't hear it, the announcers initially believe so as well. Wilmot waives it right away stoppage of play, play should be dead no goal.

Epic collapse
🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Nootin

agillarda

Registered User
Jan 3, 2024
306
244
I hear the whistle go off before the puck goes in, not sure how you don't hear it, the announcers initially believe so as well. Wilmot waives it right away stoppage of play, play should be dead no goal.
Yes ther is a double whistle but you CAN'T see where the puck is from the live broadcast video from behind the benches.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad