Stutzle goal called off due to “interference”

umma gumma

Registered User
Apr 8, 2005
3,710
2,275
It's a soft call but he pretty clearly knocks the stick out of his hands. I'm actually quite shocked this is 7 pages long.
Well of course, the Carolina player was holding his stick near the butt end with one hand and reaching. There isn't much of a grip in that situation, doesn't take a whole lot to lose it. I mean, all defending players have to do is drop their stick any time the attacking player winds up for a shot which will send his stick flying. Is that what we want in the game?
 

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,543
1,865
I can't call it the dumbest call in the word, but it's a frustrating one as a lot of these have tended to be automatic penalties, you slash a guys stick out of his hands or lift a stick too aggressively and through the stick through the air....it's a penalty, but how do you assess whether it should be, meaning, the other player is responsible for holding on to his stick as well. Some would say, well, you did slash the stick, that isn't allowed right? The answer to that is yes, that's true, technically that is slashing, but obviously you can't call every little thing like that, there would be 25 penalties every shift.

I think this one, if the ref is simply watching those 2 players the whole way he would have probably assessed that he didn't slash the stick hard enough for it to be considered a penalty, but did he see it out of the side of his head? I can see where the call is made.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad