Stuart so far

polmaniac932

Registered User
Mar 25, 2006
1,562
102
San Jose
www.youtube.com
I like his play for us right now. I'd like to see more shots from him, but his puck movement is above average and he's done a decent job of containing players defensively (maybe not as much last night). Currently, he's 2nd in the league in +/- (something I'm not very big on, but cool nonetheless). How do you guys feel he's fitting into the team?

I for one simply love him back on the team. Some of his speed is gone from before the Thornton era, but it just gives me chills hearing Randy Hahn calling his name and just remembering his flashes of brilliance years ago, especially that one game where he scored 2 goals in the last 20 seconds to tie the game against the Kings.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,878
23,199
Bay Area
I wouldn't go so far as to say "above average puck movement", but he's been really good. Probably our most consistent defenseman so far. Dunno where we'd be without him so far this season. Hopefully he keeps it up.

However, the team is shooting the lights out when Stuey's on the ice, and Niemi is playing out of his mind when Stuey's on the ice. Regression will happen, and I'm sure people won't be so hot on him then even if his play doesn't change.
 

magic school bus

***********
Jun 4, 2010
19,415
494
San Jose, CA
Brad Stuart has been fantastic. I have no idea what some Red Wings fans were talking about. Maybe he's been re-energized coming back to California, because he looks nothing like their descriptions.

My thoughts on Stuart from earlier:

So so glad we added Stuart. He's as physical as Murray, can skate and is underrated offensively.
 

fRESH88

Registered User
Sep 26, 2011
83
0
he had a BAD night last nigh IMO. He pinched twice on plays no NHL defense should pinch on and almost gave up 2 goals from just his play alone. He also did some other bone head thing i cant remember exactly what it was but it made me rage about it. I think it was a PK and he went chasing the puck and left his man right in front of the net, luckily the past hit someones skate and we were able to get the clear.

but before last nights game hes been ok. Its great to see that we finally have a defense that wont be pushed around in front of our own net. Im waitin to see how we play against the blues before I can put my finger on how this defense really is
 

hockeyball

Registered User
Nov 10, 2007
21,560
944
He's been as good as anyone could have hoped, and one of the best defensive signings we've ever had. Hope he keeps it up.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,878
23,199
Bay Area
Def our best stay at home Dman since Hannan.

vlasic.jpg


?
 

OldAsianSharksFan

More 1OV picks please
Jul 20, 2009
6,192
1
San Jose
He has been the consistent defenseman on the Sharks, even more consistent than Vlasic this year.

One of the best free agent signing in the league this offseason besides Parise.
 

ArcataShark

in dubious battle
Jul 3, 2010
946
0
Eugene
I've been impressed, he moves the puck very well. Skates and is physical. Agreed that he was a great signing.
 

McDeez

Registered User
Feb 8, 2007
1,115
167
San Jose
He's happy to be back in San Jose and it's definitely showing in his play.. Great offseason addition.:handclap:
 

FSS

Registered User
Aug 2, 2012
139
0
Been very happy with Stuart, and with how inconsistent & flat we've been during large portions of games, without his play (And Nemo) we wouldn't be 7-0.

For a 7-0 team, there ares some issues...but Brad Stuart ain't one.
 

Negatively Positive

Mr. Longevity
Mar 2, 2011
10,306
2,226
This team would be 4-3 or 3-4 now if we had Petrecki up or Demers up over Stuart. Guy is awesome.

Are you saying Petrecki and Demers are equal in terms of impact? Demers has played 3 seasons and over 180 games some of it as a top 4 while Petrecki just played his first nhl game. Some even called Demers as a Boyle replacement even though I don't agree with it. Demers can actually make a 10 foot pass and he can skate. Petrecki is at best a bottom pairing guy with a chance of being a complete bust. I agree we'd be screwed without Stuart but that's because we're missing Burns AND Demers. Without Stuart, Demers, and Burns, Murray would be a top 4 d-man and we would have to plug Petrecki in for all 7 games so far which would be a disaster.
 

JoeThorntonsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,436
25,612
Fremont, CA
Well, theoretically speaking, minutes-wise, it would be something like Murray taking the spot Stuart currently has, and somebody else having Murray's spot, which would be much, much worse. Stuart is really damn good and has been vital to the success of the team so far. That's my point.
 

Negatively Positive

Mr. Longevity
Mar 2, 2011
10,306
2,226
Well, theoretically speaking, minutes-wise, it would be something like Murray taking the spot Stuart currently has, and somebody else having Murray's spot, which would be much, much worse. Stuart is really damn good and has been vital to the success of the team so far. That's my point.

Well if Demers was healthy and no Stuart I would hope to see

Irwin-Boyle
Vlasic-Demers
Murray-Braun

which would be the same pairings as now except Demers instead of Stuart.

Without Stuart or Demers and Petrecki has to fill in

Irwin-Boyle
Murray-Vlasic
Petrecki-Braun

Obviously Stuart has been great but we would be much more screwed with Petrecki in the lineup than with Demers.
 

CaptainShark

Registered User
Sep 25, 2004
4,355
2,681
Fulda, Germany
Last game was probably his worst so fare, not that he was terrible or anything.

Overall he has done a fantastic job. Very steady, laying the occasional big hit, he doesn´t shoot a lot, but still has a bomb, he seems to know when to join the rush / be aggressiv (e.g. that rush in Calgary when he went around the D of the Flames and then made a beautiful centering pass to... ??? (don´t remember) or late against the Ducks when Logan tied it while Stuart was crashing the net.

He also has been a big part of the "new" PK... All in all, i am very happy!

Can´t wait fur Burns return...

Boyle - Irwin
Burns - Stuart
Vlasic - Murray / Demers / Braun /

:) Like
 
Last edited:

JPE123

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
3,153
10
I'm a Wings fan and was always a Stuart fan. He is as reliable as they come. He did have a couple of sub par games for us last year in the playoffs but I'd take him on my team any day. He's not flashy on or off the ice but he is solid as they come.
 

bullslugg

Registered User
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2007
420
143
Cali central valley
Stewie makes our D-corp much more complete. top-4 when healthy, Boyle, Pickles, Burns, Stuart. As strong a group as any other. Bottom Demers, braun, Irwin, Murray = NICE! :yo: :nod:
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,519
6,964
ontario
he sucks, every one sucks, fire them all, trade them all. am i capturing the mood in the game day threads right after these past few games? lol :sarcasm:
 

SJeasy

Registered User
Feb 3, 2005
12,538
3
San Jose
Stuart has been bailing Vlasic out this year. Vlasic's puck skills have regressed if that is possible. And Stuart/Vlasic puts the Sharks in the same position of having their best puck movers all on the right side. When Demers is healthy, a 5on5 pairing of Demers/Vlasic would be nice. Move Stuart to the left and he tops the left side in puck skills although Irwin has been a nice surprise.

A note on Braun, his puck skills seem to have fallen off as well. Take note of the shot clock on the game when Boyle was sick; puck skills count.

Here is the depth I see with a healthy team.

Right side:
Boyle
Burns
Demers/Braun

Left side:
Pickles
Stuart
Irwin/Murray
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad