Player Discussion Stuart Skinner

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Skinner isn’t the answer. Perfectly fine backup, but he just isn’t a starter at this point. You can’t be giving up more than a goal above expected every time you play a decent team. Just simply unacceptable. The oilers are up 2-1 going into the second period last night with literally any WHL goalie in net. That is how bad skinner played, and yet there are still people making excuses for him. It’s crazy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spawn and frag2
I can’t imagine a scenario where any of the other 31 teams in the league say “let’s trade for Skinner, he’s better than anyone in our organization.”
He’s easily the worst starter in the league and we’re going to try to win a cup with him, well, we won’t win a cup with him.
 
I can’t imagine a scenario where any of the other 31 teams in the league say “let’s trade for Skinner, he’s better than anyone in our organization.”

No, but, to a very VERY small group of bubble or rebuilding teams, Stu could hold intrigue because of his age and possible untapped potential. He also holds a second year which is a good safety net for a couple teams that maybe have uncertainty at the position themselves.

They are, to me:

Utah- Karl Vejmelka is a pending UFA. If UHC don’t think he is going to re-sign, flipping him for a young goalie with term plus another asset or two is a decent gamble on their part. Armstrong can then use 2025-26 to decide which of Stu, Connor Ingram, and Jaxson Stauber should be signed long-term.

Anaheim- Wasting Gibson’s remaining years and recovered value seems unwise, so getting a package back that includes a goalie who fits the age range of their core makes sense. Skinner then becomes the backup behind Dostal, a much better fit.

Buffalo- IF they choose to make UPL available in favour of Levi, I can again seeing Stu being part of the return the Sabres would want- even as a temporary stopgap. If Levi were to struggle, they know Skinner can play 50 games.
 
No, but, to a very VERY small group of bubble or rebuilding teams, Stu could hold intrigue because of his age and possible untapped potential. He also holds a second year which is a good safety net for a couple teams that maybe have uncertainty at the position themselves.

They are, to me:

Utah- Karl Vejmelka is a pending UFA. If UHC don’t think he is going to re-sign, flipping him for a young goalie with term plus another asset or two is a decent gamble on their part. Armstrong can then use 2025-26 to decide which of Stu, Connor Ingram, and Jaxson Stauber should be signed long-term.

Anaheim- Wasting Gibson’s remaining years and recovered value seems unwise, so getting a package back that includes a goalie who fits the age range of their core makes sense. Skinner then becomes the backup behind Dostal, a much better fit.

Buffalo- IF they choose to make UPL available in favour of Levi, I can again seeing Stu being part of the return the Sabres would want- even as a temporary stopgap. If Levi were to struggle, they know Skinner can play 50 games.
Again, all I see are contractual issues, he’s not better on the ice.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad