Confirmed with Link: STL/ANA Cam Fowler, 2027 4th for 2027 2nd, Jeremie Biakabatuka

PeoriaBlues309

Formerly CaliforniaBlues310
Apr 9, 2013
4,915
4,069
Peoria, IL.
IMG_8072.jpeg


The game card matched the eye test today. I thought he looked excellent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shpongle falls

simon IC

Moderator
Sponsor
Sep 8, 2007
9,358
7,797
Canada
They were awesome, but so were Lidstrom and Niedermayer. Would you rather have Heiskanen or Lindell? Makar or Manson? Physicality on D doesn't feel like our biggest need.
Respectfully, there is a difference there. Lidstrom and Niedermayer weren't bangers, but they never shied away from physical contact. They went to the dirty areas. That is what made them effective two-way defencemen. But I do get your point.
 

Bye Bye Blueston

Registered User
Dec 4, 2016
20,027
21,422
Elsewhere
Respectfully, there is a difference there. Lidstrom and Niedermayer weren't bangers, but they never shied away from physical contact. They went to the dirty areas. That is what made them effective two-way defencemen. But I do get your point.
Absolutely. And I love physical defensemen. I wanted us to draft the Norwegian kid who was blowing everyone up at WC rather than Jiricek even. I'm just saying that we need to add high-end talent more than we need to add bangers. Tyler Tucker ain't the answer.
 

Louie the Blue

Because it's a trap
Jul 27, 2010
4,863
3,201
What the definition of not being able to handle it? If it’s that they haven’t been good enough to be a team with a backend capable of doing anything in the playoffs or even making them the yes, I agree. But that IMO should not be our goal this year.
I do not think there are alternatives on the roster that are capable of playing 20 + minutes a night of top 4 average ice time on this roster. Asking Suter, Parayko, Faulk, Broberg to make up the difference with additional playing time risks them to injury, which can exacerbate the flaws of the roster, and ask Binnington/Hofer to face a greater volume of shots on a nightly basis leading them more prone to injury as well.

I don’t care if the Blues make the POs or not this year. Fowler allows the D to be passable without risking injuries to others and stunted development.
 

simon IC

Moderator
Sponsor
Sep 8, 2007
9,358
7,797
Canada
I still want to know what happens when Leddy comes back. We will have,
down the left side:
Broberg
Leddy
Fowler
Suter
I don't accept an answer that involves one playing their "off" side. Something will have to give.
 

DatDude44

Hmmmm?
Feb 23, 2012
6,321
3,192
I still want to know what happens when Leddy comes back. We will have,
down the left side:
Broberg
Leddy
Fowler
Suter
I don't accept an answer that involves one playing their "off" side. Something will have to give.
Fowler-Parayko
Broberg-Faulk
Suter-Leddy

Is my guess.

tho I really like what perunovich has brought at 5v5 in 3rd pair minutes, he seems to help tilt the ice in our favor most shifts in his limited role. Just don’t foresee us scratching leddy for him and if we scratch Suter then leddy-Peru would be the softest 3rd pair in the league lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: LGB and TheOrganist

Stlblue50

Registered User
Apr 17, 2019
725
535
To me this trade happened because Faulk has been absolutely terrible. Since this is his 3rd season in a row of struggles, they got tired of waiting for him to snap out of it.

Now they can play either Broberg or Fowler with Faulk while lowering his ice time. Hopefully more sheltered minutes will give him some confidence back.

Fowler looked really good last night. He has always been a smooth skater but his outlet passing was spot on.
 

STL fan in MN

Registered User
Aug 16, 2007
7,743
5,374
I’m way late to the party here but I have some opinions. Heck, I didn’t even know about the trade until I turned on the game in the 2nd and saw a stat about D ice time and Fowler had played about 10 minutes at that point in the game Sat night and I was hella confused. I was at my son’s hockey tourney all day and never opened social media I guess lol.

For the actual trade, I’m ok with it. I’m not a huge fan of trading away another 2nd and I’m not convinced Fowler is all that good anymore at age 33 but clearly Broberg and Suter were getting overworked and unfortunately, Peru, POJ and Kessel weren’t taking the step they were hoping they’d take.

I think my main issue with it is that once again, we are trying to bandaid the top-4 LD hole that’s been gaping ever since Bouwmeester collapsed and had to retire a few years ago. First it was Scandella for a 2nd and 4th. He seemed to fit in alright with Parayko for a while…and then he didn’t. Then it was Leddy for a 2nd, Walman and Sunny. Now Fowler for another 2nd but at least we got a 4th back in the same draft (2 years from now). It just seems like treading water to me. And while 2nd don’t hit a lot, I feel we’re eating them like candy. I’d rather them just go get a guy that’ll actually be a longterm solution instead of all these assets every couple of years to continually try to stop-gap plug the same hole. Hopefully Lindstein is the eventual answer but he’s still likely at least a couple years away and we shouldn’t expect him to just jump right into a top-4 role even when he is ready.

But all that said, it’s not horrible. I can see the need. But he’s 33 so the Fowler in my head likely isn’t the Fowler we got. The joke’s been done a ton already but damn would this likely be a good defense if this was 5-8 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Celtic Note

Bye Bye Blueston

Registered User
Dec 4, 2016
20,027
21,422
Elsewhere
I’m way late to the party here but I have some opinions. Heck, I didn’t even know about the trade until I turned on the game in the 2nd and saw a stat about D ice time and Fowler had played about 10 minutes at that point in the game Sat night and I was hella confused. I was at my son’s hockey tourney all day and never opened social media I guess lol.

For the actual trade, I’m ok with it. I’m not a huge fan of trading away another 2nd and I’m not convinced Fowler is all that good anymore at age 33 but clearly Broberg and Suter were getting overworked and unfortunately, Peru, POJ and Kessel weren’t taking the step they were hoping they’d take.

I think my main issue with it is that once again, we are trying to bandaid the top-4 LD hole that’s been gaping ever since Bouwmeester collapsed and had to retire a few years ago. First it was Scandella for a 2nd and 4th. He seemed to fit in alright with Parayko for a while…and then he didn’t. Then it was Leddy for a 2nd, Walman and Sunny. Now Fowler for another 2nd but at least we got a 4th back in the same draft (2 years from now). It just seems like treading water to me. And while 2nd don’t hit a lot, I feel we’re eating them like candy. I’d rather them just go get a guy that’ll actually be a longterm solution instead of all these assets every couple of years to continually try to stop-gap plug the same hole. Hopefully Lindstein is the eventual answer but he’s still likely at least a couple years away and we shouldn’t expect him to just jump right into a top-4 role even when he is ready.

But all that said, it’s not horrible. I can see the need. But he’s 33 so the Fowler in my head likely isn’t the Fowler we got. The joke’s been done a ton already but damn would this likely be a good defense if this was 5-8 years ago.
Fowler is a band aid, but we have drafted 3 LD in top 2 rounds last 2 years and acquired Broberg. If 1 or more of Lindstein, Ralph, or Fischer (or even another prospect like Burns or Buchinger or Kormosolov) are good enough to play in top 4, along with Broberg, we won't have to keep going for these type of fixes. I have pretty high level of confidence that will happen.
 
Last edited:

STL fan in MN

Registered User
Aug 16, 2007
7,743
5,374
Fowler is a band aid, but we have drafted 3 LD in top 2 rounds last 2 years and acquired Broberg. If 1 or more of Lindstein, Ralph, or Fischer (or even another prospect like Burns or Buchinger or Kormosolov) are good enough to play in top 4, along with Brogberg, we won't have to keep going for these type of fixes. I have pretty high level of confidence that will happen.
Yeah, eventually. I definitely believe in Lindstein and am hopeful on some of the others. Even if one or more of Ralph, Fischer, Koromyslov, Burns etc could be a solid #5 Edmundson type, that’d be a win. I guess I’m just annoyed with the last handful of years. To put it in the words of the great Mike Ehrmantraut, no more half-measures. We need full-measures. Or as you say, for one of the prospects to eventually get to that level but that seems a ways off still.
 

Davimir Tarablad

Registered User
Sep 16, 2015
9,643
13,533
I still want to know what happens when Leddy comes back. We will have,
down the left side:
Broberg
Leddy
Fowler
Suter
I don't accept an answer that involves one playing their "off" side. Something will have to give.
That implies Leddy does come back this year, which I don't think is necessarily a guarantee. There's also the chance that he returns and looks the same(or close to) as he did before getting shut down, in which case he probably would end up needing to spend more time in the press box than on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TK 421

BlueSeal

Believe In The Note
Dec 1, 2013
7,784
7,018
Out West
I’m way late to the party here but I have some opinions. Heck, I didn’t even know about the trade until I turned on the game in the 2nd and saw a stat about D ice time and Fowler had played about 10 minutes at that point in the game Sat night and I was hella confused. I was at my son’s hockey tourney all day and never opened social media I guess lol.

For the actual trade, I’m ok with it. I’m not a huge fan of trading away another 2nd and I’m not convinced Fowler is all that good anymore at age 33 but clearly Broberg and Suter were getting overworked and unfortunately, Peru, POJ and Kessel weren’t taking the step they were hoping they’d take.

I think my main issue with it is that once again, we are trying to bandaid the top-4 LD hole that’s been gaping ever since Bouwmeester collapsed and had to retire a few years ago. First it was Scandella for a 2nd and 4th. He seemed to fit in alright with Parayko for a while…and then he didn’t. Then it was Leddy for a 2nd, Walman and Sunny. Now Fowler for another 2nd but at least we got a 4th back in the same draft (2 years from now). It just seems like treading water to me. And while 2nd don’t hit a lot, I feel we’re eating them like candy. I’d rather them just go get a guy that’ll actually be a longterm solution instead of all these assets every couple of years to continually try to stop-gap plug the same hole. Hopefully Lindstein is the eventual answer but he’s still likely at least a couple years away and we shouldn’t expect him to just jump right into a top-4 role even when he is ready.

But all that said, it’s not horrible. I can see the need. But he’s 33 so the Fowler in my head likely isn’t the Fowler we got. The joke’s been done a ton already but damn would this likely be a good defense if this was 5-8 years ago.

If we traded for a 'better' Dman, we may be looking at sending back a lot more than a 2nd and pieces that we may really not want to part with and there's a good chance that we would all hate whatever contract they're on.

I agree on the bandaiding but what kind of dman would we get for a 2nd that can play now? Our blueline is trash mainly because we don't have anyone downstairs ready to go or even close to being ready and what we got isn't going to work. So what do we do?

Cam Fowler.

Even the players we've gotten that have been franchise changers, like ROR, costed something that we may have not wanted to trade, like Tage, but we won the Cup, so it worked out. Had we not won the Cup, would we still say the same thing today?

Picks are there to be used and imo if you use them, they need to serve a purpose. This one did.
 

Xerloris

reckless optimism
Jun 9, 2015
7,981
8,654
St.Louis
That implies Leddy does come back this year, which I don't think is necessarily a guarantee. There's also the chance that he returns and looks the same(or close to) as he did before getting shut down, in which case he probably would end up needing to spend more time in the press box than on the ice.

I'm not sure Leddy will be back this season. His injury clearly was significant and the team probably knew about it for a long time. Sort of like when Jbo played through his hip injury for like an entire season before finally having surgery.
 

Linkens Mastery

Conductor of the MontyTown Express
Sponsor
Jan 15, 2014
21,208
19,373
Hyrule
Holy shit. That's... tolerable? I really dont know much about the dude these days. Could have been way worse.
Puts him right in line with Leddy, Ducks Retained about 40% from his 6.5mil contact to get him to 4Mil. If he can just eat minutes and exit the zone while playing with Colt it should be a fine band aid and we can hopefully flip him later this season or the offseason for a 2nd rounder (and maybe more if he plays well enough to increase his value)
 

Mike Liut

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 12, 2008
20,162
9,700
Fowler is a great fit. The tank is over. This team will push for a WC and probably finish just short and draft around 15. Not ideal, so hopefully the youngsters gain some experience and get even better next year. I still want to see Snuggs and Dvo later this year for a few games.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad