Steven Stamkos career

rmartin65

Registered User
Apr 7, 2011
2,787
2,310
BureStamkos
Goals (G/GP), Lead3 (1)2 (2)
Goals (G/GP), Top 23 (3)5 (3)
Goals (G/GP), Top 34 (4)5 (6)
Goals (G/GP), Top 44 (4)6 (6)
Goals (G/GP), Top 55 (4)6 (6)
Points (P/GP), Lead0 (0)0 (0)
Points (P/GP), Top 21 (0)2 (0)
Points (P/GP), Top 32 (1)2 (2)
Points (P/GP), Top 42 (1)2 (2)
Points (P/GP), Top 53 (1)4 (2)
AS-110
AS-222
AS-322
Hart, Lead00
Hart, Top 201
Hart, Top 311
Hart, Top 411
Hart, Top 511

Both dealt with injuries that likely cost them a couple awards. Both dealt with solid competition for awards at their position (Bure against Jagr and Selanne; Stamkos against Crosby and Malkin).
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
41,829
18,408
Mulberry Street
Unless you are a team insider or you regularly travel / eat / bus with the team, you are entirely incapable of determining whether the given player "deserved" to be captain or not.

Yea, never understood how people can outright claim a player isn't a good captain or doesn't deserve to be captain. They arent with the team so they have zero idea.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,503
6,032
Well, no fantasies about future.
When TBL missed postseason in 2017 many people connected it with Stamkos missing nearly entire season. Maybe those people didn`t want to see, that TBL had the same number of points with western SC finalist NSH and ignore how raw TBL made postseason with Stamkos missing 60% of regular season 2013/14.
I mean again that seem to start with the conclusion, Stamkos miss nearly an entire season, his team miss the playoff, but they did in 2013/2014

When Stamkos played in 2014 they went 24W-9L-4OT a 115 pts pace, when they did not a 22-18-5 pace (89 pts pace out of the playoff), what should we conclude by that 2014 season ?

I think there is a bit of motivated reasoning, one could spin all of this the other way around when looking at 2014, how good they were with someone scoring at a 55 goal per 82 pace in the very low scoring 2014 nhl, enough to push them in the playoff despite a mediocre performance without him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmartin65

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,942
29,742
Before the leg, Stamkos was a very fast player and an amazing EV scorer. His 60 goal season - 48 were even strength. He always had the one timer but he was a multi-dimensional scorer.

After the break, that changed. 5 on 5 scoring went down and relied more on the PP.

Regarding the playoffs - sometimes bad, almost always disappointing even if okay.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,942
29,742
Well, no fantasies about future.
When TBL missed postseason in 2017 many people connected it with Stamkos missing nearly entire season. Maybe those people didn`t want to see, that TBL had the same number of points with western SC finalist NSH and ignore how raw TBL made postseason with Stamkos missing 60% of regular season 2013/14.
When we missed in 2017 we lost Stamkos and also like a half dozen other Cs for long stretches. That was the season Yanni Gourde and Brayden Point broke out - Point was our 4C and Gourde was in the AHL at the start of the season but Stamkos and Tyler Johnson missed a chunk and we sold at the deadline (Filppula was playing C and was traded but that was also a salary dump). If I recall that's also the season we traded Bishop (and ended up with Cernak).

Just to say a lot went into us missing the playoffs that year - Tampa lost a lot of players that season and still almost squeaked in.
 

TheBig08

Registered User
Sep 28, 2024
69
8
Before the leg, Stamkos was a very fast player and an amazing EV scorer. His 60 goal season - 48 were even strength. He always had the one timer but he was a multi-dimensional scorer.

After the break, that changed. 5 on 5 scoring went down and relied more on the PP.

Regarding the playoffs - sometimes bad, almost always disappointing even if okay.
How many of those goals did martin st louis asisst on? its an actually question becuase some people say thats why he got so many goals.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,942
29,742
How many of those goals did martin st louis asisst on? its an actually question becuase some people say thats why he got so many goals.
20 total assists (13 primary/7 secondary). They were split for a good chunk of that season and Teddy Purcell was on his line for a stretch. I'd guess if you looked at his 40 goals last season Kucherov probably assisted on more of those than MSL did on his 60.
 

TheBig08

Registered User
Sep 28, 2024
69
8
20 total assists (13 primary/7 secondary). They were split for a good chunk of that season and Teddy Purcell was on his line for a stretch. I'd guess if you looked at his 40 goals last season Kucherov probably assisted on more of those than MSL did on his 60.
Thats kind of a good, amount take 20 from 60 you get 40 so if he dint have st louis he probably at best would have 50 something not 60 and even if we dont count secondary just primary that still only leaves with his him get 40 at best only 50 something. But maybe he wold have done it without him.
 

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
29,586
17,692
How many of those goals did martin st louis asisst on? its an actually question becuase some people say thats why he got so many goals.

i hate almost all the recent changes to hockey-ref but one advantage is they make it very easy to see how many times one guy assisted on another guy’s goals

2010: 27 out of 51
2011: 24 out of 45
2012: 20 out of 60
2013: 18 out of 29
2014: 3 out of 25

post-MSL trade

2015: 43 goals with no discernible star winger feeding him

assists from kucherov

2016: 11 out of 36
2017: 5 out of 9
2018: 16 out of 27
2019: 25 out of 45
2020: 11 out of 29
2021: kuch missed the whole year, 17 goals
2022: 17 out of 42
2023: 18 out of 34
2024: 28 out of 40
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,942
29,742
i hate almost all the recent changes to hockey-ref but one advantage is they make it very easy to see how many times one guy assisted on another guy’s goals

2010: 27 out of 51
2011: 24 out of 45
2012: 20 out of 60
2013: 18 out of 29
2014: 3 out of 25

post-MSL trade

2015: 43 goals with no discernible star winger feeding him

assists from kucherov

2016: 11 out of 36
2017: 5 out of 9
2018: 16 out of 27
2019: 25 out of 45
2020: 11 out of 29
2021: kuch missed the whole year, 17 goals
2022: 17 out of 42
2023: 18 out of 34
2024: 28 out of 40
28 out of 40 is f***ing bonkers.
 

TheBig08

Registered User
Sep 28, 2024
69
8
i hate almost all the recent changes to hockey-ref but one advantage is they make it very easy to see how many times one guy assisted on another guy’s goals

2010: 27 out of 51
2011: 24 out of 45
2012: 20 out of 60
2013: 18 out of 29
2014: 3 out of 25

post-MSL trade

2015: 43 goals with no discernible star winger feeding him

assists from kucherov

2016: 11 out of 36
2017: 5 out of 9
2018: 16 out of 27
2019: 25 out of 45
2020: 11 out of 29
2021: kuch missed the whole year, 17 goals
2022: 17 out of 42
2023: 18 out of 34
2024: 28 out of 40
proves my point that without st louis he doesn't put up the same numbers without him in 2010 he maybe gets 40 probably 30 a chance at 50 and 2011 he maybe gets 40 probably 30 then 2012 he gets maybe 50 and probably gets 40 2013 maybe 50 probably 40 if he plays the whole season maybe 50 probably 40 so he doesnt do bad without st louis hes just not putting up the same numbers and he dosent have the 60 goal season without him.

Can you look up how many ovi goals backstrom asissted on during his whole career with each season individually and post them I would like to know I am a ovi fan.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad