Post-Game Talk: Stars 1 @ Panthers 3 - 22/2 - v 1.1.1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mogo

Registered User
Jun 26, 2002
25,870
11,982
We had no real scoring chance while Dallas had 3-5 solid ones
 

Mogo

Registered User
Jun 26, 2002
25,870
11,982
Just because we are down 0-1 doesn’t mean we played horrible.

Driedger didn’t look good on that goal. Few individual mistakes here and there.

But it was far from an horrible period. We actually took control in the last 5 minutes.

Few defensive breaks downs we were lucky didnt cost us. We really didnt generate anything in the offensive zone.

Need to come out storming in the 2nd
 

iam76

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
11,336
5,988
Connecticut
we are lucky this is 1-0. but that goal was brutal. we are not getting many chances after our initial shots. that needs to change or we r going to lose
 

sinDer

Registered User
Nov 22, 2006
3,682
2,683
Drummondville, QC
Few defensive breaks downs we were lucky didnt cost us. We really didnt generate anything in the offensive zone.

Need to come out storming in the 2nd

I agree. But I don’t think we played a bad period.

They are working hard.

But it’s true that they have to find a way to get those scoring chances. We have to give Dallas’ D some credit though.
 

SJSharksfan39

Registered User
Oct 11, 2008
28,330
6,239
San Jose, CA
Randy Moller bringing up the same thing I saw a lot being posted about here over the weekend. It's 2021 and the NHL still doesn't have technologies to fix Ice patches other than a hockey puck. Watching them do that feels like living in the 1800s when they had to wash clothes by hand.
 

iam76

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
11,336
5,988
Connecticut
gonna say this and it might be unpopular. but vehaegee and duclair need to be better on the top line. they are far from bad. but sometimes it just feels like they are not on the same page
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad