bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 9,254
- 9,715
I don't think Quebec is anything more than an emergency relocation site.I could see that, but we all know there's like one step for Arizona and Atlanta (arena deals done) and one step for Houston (Feritta pulling the trigger) and one step for Quebec (PKP adding a partner so there's enough money to buy the team).
San Diego and almost anyone else we can think of have 2 steps or 3 steps. San Diego is trying to build an arena, but not trying to own a team, because the Kroenkes already have one. They need an arena AND an owner. (Or an arena AND a buyer for the Avalanche, but that seems unlikely).
If SD isn't realistic then Ontario 2.0 is the 4th, but I think selling the avs would be much easier to do if there is an acknowledgement from the league (privately) that sd would get a team.
This isn't all going to happen within the same 2 years or whatever, so the fact each option is on a different schedule is a plus bc they need those factors that create timeline separation.