Value of: Stammer to LA

Kingspiracy

Registered User
Nov 13, 2006
6,377
2,535
He may have old balls, but still appears to be putting up decent numbers. What is the cost of bringing Stamkos to LA ?

We need offense and the Preds appear to be struggling, is he available?

Would The Preds be interested in established players or only futures?

Perhaps something based on Fiala+ or Moore + or Danault+ to help us balance books?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lt Dan
He may have old balls, but still appears to be putting up decent numbers. What is the cost of bringing Stamkos to LA ?

We need offense and the Preds appear to be struggling, is he available?

Would The Preds be interested in established players or only futures?

Perhaps something based on Fiala+ or Moore + or Danault+ to help us balance books?
Huge pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky and go4hockey
He may have old balls, but still appears to be putting up decent numbers. What is the cost of bringing Stamkos to LA ?

We need offense and the Preds appear to be struggling, is he available?

Would The Preds be interested in established players or only futures?

Perhaps something based on Fiala+ or Moore + or Danault+ to help us balance books?
I wouldn’t touch that contact even if he came cheap. No thanks.
 
He may have old balls, but still appears to be putting up decent numbers. What is the cost of bringing Stamkos to LA ?

We need offense and the Preds appear to be struggling, is he available?

Would The Preds be interested in established players or only futures?

Perhaps something based on Fiala+ or Moore + or Danault+ to help us balance books?
🙏

Actually, there are probably 3 relevant answers here:

1. Stamkos has the NMC and I don't imagine he's ready to waive it. Even for LA? But who knows. Seems unlikely just 6 months later though.

2. Us Preds fans... hell yeah, we'd GIVE you Stamkos. For free. If you want to give us anything back, so much the better! Especially young players or futures! But heck, even Cap-balancing assets with shorter term might be worth a look.

3. Barry Trotz... hell no... Stamkos is a franchise superstar, core to our Cup hopes, and totally unavailable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: go4hockey
1677822775224019.png
 
That’s exactly what the kings need, another old fossil that’s gonna be stunted in the system we play. Tampa let go of him because he’s not good defensively, is getting older, and cost a ton.

He would eventually be put on the fourth line in LA just like Kaliyev was and the only advantage he would have is once he screwed up, he would be put right back out there because he’s a veteran and not benched like a young player. He would be given linemates like Trevor Lewis, and given no creativity.

The best thing for LA to do is to let go of the coaching stuff, and all the management and start fresh building around the young guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: go4hockey

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad