AngryScotsman
Registered User
Well the Mayor is Doug Ford...so anything can happen.
Oh you didn't hear...
Well the Mayor is Doug Ford...so anything can happen.
Pretty much this. Any business paying an athlete millions in endorsements will do their due diligence and have their bean counters crunch the numbers on how much Stamkos's name is worth to them in each of the 30 jerseys. If Stamkos in Toronto ends up making them 5mil a year more than anywhere else, naturally they'd pay him more if he wound up in that market. Passing along a chart that shows how much he's worth to them in each city isn't circumvention, he's still free to make the choice to go somewhere else, earn less money from Sportchek, but save more money on lower tax rates or cost of living.
I highly doubt they were in the same meeting. All the post said was he was meeting with MLSE and the Mayor and he also had a meeting with the CEO of Canadian Tire. Separate meetings.
It's not a loophole. It's just a violation that the league may or may not choose to overlook.
[B said:So, if he ends up signing in Toronto and then gets a sponsorship deal with Canadian tire later this summer, I guarantee you the owners will be lighting up Gary's phone.[/[/B]QUOTE]
Hopefully they do. And as much as I hate Betman, I hope he responds with "listen morons, Stamkos already had/has a deal in place with Sport Check... you know, that subsidiary of Canadian Tire". Unless something changed over the past year (I think the Sport Check contract was done in 2014), I see nothing wrong with this.
Here's a great quote from Stamkos himself in 2014: ""I am excited to be joining Sport Chek and the Canadian Tire family of companies. As a kid growing up in Canada, I know how Canadians admire and trust the brands," said Steven Stamkos. "It is my hope that by working with Sport Chek, we will be able to inspire millions of Canadians to live healthy, active lifestyles and gain all the positives that come from sport."
This thread has no reason to exist.
So why is the Canadian Tire CEO involved in this meeting if it's not to signal to Stamkos that there's more money coming his way than the actual offer?
And yes, it's a bad trend to allow if the NHL cares about parity. This opens the door for larger market teams to offer money beyond the cap to players, which is cap circumvention.
If this was a meeting set up separately by Stamkos and Meehan, then fine. Fair game. If it was set up by the Leafs, not fine.
I think everyone understands how endorsements work.
He hasn't signed anywhere yet and already a Habs fan is crying
Feels so good having filthy rich owners !
But, if its true, 29 of the leagues owners, Gary Bettman's bosses, will raise hell.
It gives big market teams a clear advantage over other markets. You don't think NYR couldn't line up 15 sponsors for him? What about the LA teams?
It creates a competitive imbalance when it comes to recruiting players beyond just rich teams vs poor teams.
So, if he ends up signing in Toronto and then gets a sponsorship deal with Canadian tire later this summer, I guarantee you the owners will be lighting up Gary's phone.
If you think this is competitive imbalance you should look at other sports leagues. The NHL already has a Hard Cap. What would you like them to do? Ban players from signing endorsement deals? No sports league has 100% competitive balance. Theres varying amounts of money to be made aside from the players salary depending on the city. Not just in the NHL, but across all leagues.
Almost every team in the league has filthy rich owners. LOL.
Dreger: MLSE employee - wrong - TSN/Bell employee
McKenize: MLSE employee - wrong again - also TSN/Bell employee
Simmons: Not technically MLSE employee - not technically...not at all - CONTRACTED
Mirtle: Not really an insider - so then who cares?
Seems like if you're trying to avoid tampering allegations, you should get your employees to not perpetuate the storyline of Stamkos heading to Toronto
I think Bobcat is full of crap with his 3.5M sponsorship package, and I don't entirely believe Simmons. That said though, if the Leafs put together a "portfolio" of companies who have reached out to them to build an eventual professional relationship with Stamkos if/when he is in a Leafs jersey, it probably isnt circumvention as per the CBA. This is of course assuming none of these corporations have anything to do with MLSE.
If MLSE offered him sponsorship through TFC obviously that would be an issue.
Also remember financial terms aren't supposed to be talked about before July 1. If this is simply "welcome to Toronto, meet my very rich friend who is excited about you coming here and has no affiliation with MLSE."
I agree it's a bit shady, but it's also taking advantage of something that few teams around the league can offer: a legitimate bump in Sponsorships due to a hometown premium talent playing for an original 6 franchise.
Maybe I'm wrong, but that's my opinion. Now... Whether I believe Simmons? Ehhhhh
But, if its true, 29 of the leagues owners, Gary Bettman's bosses, will raise hell.
It gives big market teams a clear advantage over other markets. You don't think NYR couldn't line up 15 sponsors for him? What about the LA teams?
It creates a competitive imbalance when it comes to recruiting players beyond just rich teams vs poor teams.
So, if he ends up signing in Toronto and then gets a sponsorship deal with Canadian tire later this summer, I guarantee you the owners will be lighting up Gary's phone.