HF Reader
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2018
- 541
- 386
Give them the rest of the season to come around and then make the hard decisions. My list of untouchables is getting very short. I'm down to one and a half (Sanderson and Tkachuk if BT can be salvaged). I wouldn't just give the players away, and am concerned about how untradeable some of these contracts might be.I think they are a bunch of good players that are lacking a superduperstar unless Sanderson/Stutzle hit another level. I don't think they fit together very well as a group, which compounds things.
The main issue is passing/carrying the play. In the forwards you have some guys that are good around the net and when they have the puck near the net, but not many guys that are great passers, carrying the puck, or have good hockey IQ. They aren't good at forechecking either. It's like a whole forward group of Hoffman's and a more physical Dave Andyerchuck in Tkachuck.
The d-men on the other hand are decent at passing and carrying the puck, less so playing defense or being physical.
So soft defenseman that would be good based around a puck possession game and forwards who suck at puck possession (carrying or retrieving). The team can barely string together two passes in a row and can't play defense.
Personally I think a major shake up is in order with the likes of Chabot, Chychrun, Norris, Batherson, Tkachuck all the main candidates for getting shipped out. Even Stutzle if the return is right. None of them are "bad" but they don't fit together IMO.
I trust Martin when he says the players need to decide what they want to be. JM believes the team lacks mature, disciplined winners. Is this problem due to habit under Smith or is it a character flaw (or both)? If the former it can be fixed. Martin seems to believe the problem is the character of some (key) players.
Last edited: