LadyStanley
Registered User
As a small business owner, I have had to prohibit sales to the EU due to shipping regulations. (Laudable goals but impractical financially to comply. )
Yeah great, if you want another governing body, meddling in local affairs, new rules and regulations, and Canada would be paying not recieving, In Sweden we pay 2.3 billion dollars to EU this year, so for Canada probably 10 billion. So without every person 0-110 years old would have 20 dollar extra per month, this has been going on for decades.
POTUS didn’t even know who was in BRICS, thought S was Spain lol.Seems like the USMCA is something already being threatened from the POTUS end.
And I wouldn’t be surprised if BRICS enters the discussion.
Dude - Alberta alone contributes $2.9 billion to the rest of Canada already net of the benefits we receive.
So on the one hand, having to contribute slightly more to have it go to Romania, rather than Newfoundland, isn't that big a deal.
On the other hand - Canada joining the EU will never, ever happen. The UK couldn't make being in the EU work, and you can see Europe from England. Having Canada would be 10x as difficult.
Norway is also among the major net contributors and follows the regulations despite not even being a member, that's more about access to the internal market. Without it you'd still be paying through tariffs and alike and goods that don't follow the regulations would be untradeable. As for Canada, full European internal market access is much less vital as it is for Sweden and Norway. A much lighter trade agreement would likely be in mutual interest.Yeah great, if you want another governing body, meddling in local affairs, new rules and regulations, and Canada would be paying not recieving, In Sweden we pay 2.3 billion dollars to EU this year, so for Canada probably 10 billion. So without every person 0-110 years old would have 20 dollar extra per month, this has been going on for decades.
Thats a bunch of balony, you think we didnt have goods before EUNorway is also among the major net contributors and follows the regulations despite not even being a member, that's more about access to the internal market. Without it you'd still be paying through tariffs and alike and goods that don't follow the regulations would be untradeable. As for Canada, full European internal market access is much less vital as it is for Sweden and Norway. A much lighter trade agreement would likely be in mutual interest.
Eh, even your own quote demonstrates that they do.Thats a bunch of balony, you think we didnt have goods before EU
Do you live in the EU? and have lived through the changes?
Norwau doesnt pay to EU
Does Norway pay into the EU budget?
Norway's financial contributions include funding to reduce disparities in Europe and contributions to the budget of EU programmes and agencies which Norway participates in.12 juli 2022
I don't see Canada actually trying to get membership, although it would be great for average Canadians on many fronts like privacy, health, mobility etc. However, it is a big big deal to give up your sovereign currency.
Likely we'll just deepen trade ties and lessen our reliance on the US economy now that they have proven to be wholly untrustworthy.
In correct. UK kept our pound the entire time we were in the EU