Ah yes, it's important for Columbus to protect itself from GM's who may wish to take advantage of this horrible tragedy.
That is not what I am suggesting. I've gone far as to suggest that perhaps Washington or Utah will give Columbus a Weber or Backstrom type contract as a favour.
There is a difference between Washington extortion CBJ with we want a 2nd round pick because we know taking Backstrom helps you a lot, because we know they would never get a team to give them that before this tragedy, and another team being soft on whatever the sweetener is to take an overpaid active player, because they know CBJ needs to reach the cap floor - or in season needs a buffer. For example, if Edmonton still had Ceci and the sweetener was a 4th instead of the 3rd they gave up, that's not the same as outright extortion. It's just the market softening and CBJ not having the leverage to say no.
There is also the factor that it could be something as simple as CBJ sells off a player and is forced to retain or take back a bad contract that they otherwise would not have taken back, just to stay above the cap floor while selling the player off. So the argument against taking a Weber or Backstrom type contract is that CBJ may not want to pay money for an inactive player, but throughout the season it likely will simplify their trade operations, and save them from having to pay even more to take money back in trades. Ultimately, it gives them more flexibility to make the best deals possible in season.
It's super easy to understand. With Weber or Backstrom they buy a 10M cap cushion for what might be six figures in real dollars (insurance), and that puts them in a position to make trades because they are the best trades for them, and not because their cap situation dictates what they can or cant do structure wise in a trade.