If the Europeans ignore it then the status is lower, I think that's pretty simple maths.
The event's status will ultimately be determined by who shows up.
If the best players are there (as they overwhelmingly were in 1996 and 2004) then that's all that matters. Europeans can ignore it if they want; their loss.
It would be pretty weird if the best players take it seriously and the fans don't.
This isn't like other sports where a best-fit has to be made to accommodate the different seasons across different regions of the world. All major hockey nations are starting up around Sept/Oct. No team is in peak playing condition.
The best players might be there, but not at their best. This is an NHL invitational exhibition.
This isn't like other sports where a best-fit has to be made to accommodate the different seasons across different regions of the world. All major hockey nations are starting up around Sept/Oct. No team is in peak playing condition.
The best players might be there, but not at their best. This is an NHL invitational exhibition.
Well, the Winter Olympics are the only event with players peaking. Even the soccer WC must be an exhibition as players aren't anymore at their best after a long season.
Like I said though, different countries have different playing seasons. To me, its close to the European season while accommodating the countries that play Summer seasons to not be an exhibition.
This structure just screams Canadian cash grab, with no real benefit to the sport as a whole.
The best players might be there, but not at their best. This is an NHL invitational exhibition.
If the Europeans ignore it then the status is lower, I think that's pretty simple maths.
If the Europeans didn't ignore the World Cup in 2004 why would they ignore it now ?
Did you get any sense from previous World Cup/Canada Cups that these guys were out of shape or disinterested in playing? The '87 final is widely regarded as the greatest hockey ever played. The good thing about playing in September is that the players are healthy and looking for a springboard into their seasons.
Because now it's played exclusively in Toronto, possibly without IIHF involvement.
Why is a Canadian cash grab any different than a IIHF or IOC cash grab?
For what it's worth, the IIHF wasn't involved in 2004 either. Also, I stayed up all night and watched the medal round games too.Because now it's played exclusively in Toronto, possibly without IIHF involvement.
I would really like World Cup coming back. One thing that makes me sad is that I am not sure whether Slovakia would be included.![]()
Because now it's played exclusively in Toronto, possibly without IIHF involvement.
I would really like World Cup coming back. One thing that makes me sad is that I am not sure whether Slovakia would be included.![]()
Well, Europeans didn't ignore the Canada Cup, did they?
Which is why you should not want it back, countries are at the mercy of the NHL's marketing department thinking about which teams will be best for business. No international tournament should be run like that.
Was it shown in Finnish TV live/at all?
Which is why you should not want it back, countries are at the mercy of the NHL's marketing department thinking about which teams will be best for business. No international tournament should be run like that.
The Canada/World Cup has always operated on the premise of having the best national squads present, which is exactly how it should be.
It's not like the NHL is going to figure that it will be better for business if Slovakia is replaced with France or Italy on account of it meaning more people and more potential TV viewers.
You seriously don't understand what's wrong with the organizers having the possibility to decide who is in and who isn't instead of having a qualifying process in place to decide the teams?So we'll see Italy, China and Brazil playing in Toronto instead of Sweden and Russia because it will sell more tickets within those communities there? Honestly, the excuses get more bizarre.