FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 53,341
- 94,105
Hockey Media would have a field day explaining how losing Mbappe is the reason why PSG won the UCL.
Hockey Media would have a field day explaining how losing Mbappe is the reason why PSG won the UCL.
PSG use space in AM so intelligently. Especially against a team like Inter who want to go man to man and press the front 3 and whoever drifts into am from their midfield.
So many teams obsess about getting the ball into final third and possess it there. (My team included)
PSG? Happy to possess ball at the top of the midfield circle, create space, then get runners with speed to expose that space.
But when facing a team who have size and strength in CBs, and not as comfortable playing vs runners?
This formation and way of progressing ball through AM is genius really.
the +2 weak side transition is insane.
It is basically an evolution of what the early 2000s Arsenal team did.
Shows what a good manager Enrique is. Totally different from how he managed Spain and Barca tactically. But these tactics suit Dembele so, so well as he is maybe the best on earth at working off the ball right now.
Another branch off the Cruyff tree.
They found the perfect players for this. Having enough cash to basically throw an entire team away and start over certainly helps, but it takes an effort to get 11 players so dedicated to playing this way.
Edit: Jesus.
Inzhagi too busy thinking about that Saudi coaching money.
Yep. Kind of crazy you have Pep, Enrique, Klopp, Slot and Arteta who basically all come from Rinus Michals brand of football.
Inter have the best low block in football or close and they have been made to look like amateurs.
Considering the low block is the scourge of football (not Tiki-taka as some would say... I always think that "take" is like saying that those who tried to prevail vs the 1-3-1 in the DPE with structured transition instead of D+C was bad for the game ahaha... the trap was the bad thing, not the thing it was trying to stop!) It is great that a team have the blueprint to decimate it. (Liverpool also play not a million miles away at times and beat it too)
I think what I like most about the PSG "version" is that, while it is as rigid( and maybe moreso) as the contemporary versions, it doesn't feel or look as rigid as Pep-ball.
I know right, to me he is tbe best player to leave the bundesliga since KdB 10 years ago. It's going to be a great move.I just want Wirtz done and delivered lol
Yeh... inherently having runners into space instead of shorter passing seems to be more fluid... even when very very drilled.
I get it though. My favorite team ever to watch is early 2000s Arsenal. Liverpool are objectively more fun to watch than City. This PSG team are magic too.
Ajax 95 was not a 4-3-3 but similar philosophy too. And incredible to watch.
This branch of the 4-3-3 is for sure the most exciting.
Yeah. I can certainly appreciate the Pep style ball even if i dont like watching it. The tactical side of it is admirable. But man is it a slog when its not firing on all cylinders.
I just want Wirtz done and delivered lol
I know right, to me he is tbe best player to leave the bundesliga since KdB 10 years ago. It's going to be a great move.
Yeh, and 10 years ago it always fired on the cylinders and was beautiful... because back then most teams played a higher line or even if deep played zonally. Heck, everyone raved about it in Barca, and then when the Spanish NT copied it and dominated, and then even early years of City it was loved.
And then people (Sean Dyche etc!) started copying Mourinho, Simeone etcs low block... but without the heavy counter approach that those guys employed... and loads of other coaches of mid-bad top flight teams realised that it was an effective tactic to mean you had a "chance" to win vs tiki-taki style football teams.
Some fantastic defensive minded coach will figure out a way to suppress this PSG/Liverpool style now... heck, Mourinho himself did it first time round to nullify Arsenal and Man United with his low-block. But hopefully it takes a while...usually takes ~5-10 years and is cyclical.