Behind Enemy Lines
Registered User
No big time Vegas magician, not a low rent guy. It's the dark shirt and goatee. Has had pretty magic mitts this series.Too classy for a close up magician, imo.
No big time Vegas magician, not a low rent guy. It's the dark shirt and goatee. Has had pretty magic mitts this series.Too classy for a close up magician, imo.
I wish we could give Nurse away. He’s not totally useless but that contract, and the boneheaded plays.. I think our current D with Ekholm instead of Nurse would be dominant.Walman? Are you Nuts? Nurse sits before Walman. Stetcher sits, Nurse plays with Kulak.
Again, no. Guys, It's Stetcher. I love his battle, but it's CLEARLY Stetcher.Klingberg is the guy that's sitting imo. Not that he's played poorly.
I could see maybe Knob going against the LD-RD split with Kulak on RD, but he's avoided that a lot in the past. Plus Nurse-Stecher gels so well.Walman? Are you Nuts? Nurse sits before Walman. Stetcher sits, Nurse plays with Kulak.
Ah, fair, and Agreed.No big time Vegas magician, not a low rent guy. It's the dark shirt and goatee. Has had pretty magic mitts this series.
There's no way they will sit Klingberg. He and Walman have been excellent together.Klingberg is the guy that's sitting imo. Not that he's played poorly.
Freaking hilarious. Light saber!
I really really couldn't, unless he's trying to lose. Keeping the BEST players in the line up is more important. Walman has been the team's 3rd best defenseman, 2nd at times.I could see maybe Knob going against the LD-RD split with Kulak on RD, but he's avoided that a lot in the past. Plus Nurse-Stecher gels so well.
Also there's no way Nurse sits before Walman. Nurse played almost 4 minutes more than Walman, which shows what the coach thinks of them. Walman is great but he's in a more limited role.
Walman? Are you Nuts? Nurse sits before Walman. Stetcher sits, Nurse plays with Kulak.
Maybe at first we go 11-7 with Ekholm being the 7. Give him limited minutes and try some pairings with him. Then just decide when the time comes to stick Ekholm with Bouchard permanentlyThere's no way they will sit Klingberg. He and Walman have been excellent together.
Why would Klingberg sit?There's no way they will sit Klingberg. He and Walman have been excellent together.
They will absolutely, imo. Just to give Ekholm some protection if he needs it. Not just because of health, but also because he hasn't played in months.Think this too. Loved Stecher tonight but he was also pretty overwhelmed in game 1. He is a warrior, but in terms of talent level and consistency I think you gotta try to go with
Ek-bouch
Kulak-nurse
Walman-Kling
Although wonder if we do 7D to start in case Ek struggles to start
But he did not return.This is the most Hintz has done the last 2 weeks. He gets an extra grade on one score card for the holding knee writhing effect.
If I'm a Dallas fan I'm saying stay down, its your best play since round one.
I was in favour of switching Perry out for Arvidsson but if Dallas wants to turn this into a trench fight then we'll probably need the worm.
I was in favour of switching Perry out for Arvidsson but if Dallas wants to turn this into a trench fight then we'll probably need the worm.
As long as he makes them. All this team needs is saves.STU: any given save
![]()
Of course, it will be Stetcher who will sit. It was precisely as a back-up that they hired him.They will absolutely, imo. Just to give Ekholm some protection if he needs it. Not just because of health, but also because he hasn't played in months.