Confirmed Signing with Link: [SJS] F Filip Zadina signs with the Sharks (1 year, $1.1M)

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,019
9,754
Zadina was a no brainer pick at the time. 9/10 times, a GM is going to take the prospect rated #3 for majority of the year at 6th overall. Especially over the more riskier, smaller player who was ranked 6th-9th overall.

that doesn't really answer my point that scouting is hard. and if he was #3 and a no brainer, why did 3, 4 and 5 pass him by?

nhl scouting groups don't pick according to consensus public draft lists. they pick based on their own scouting. no team had a better look at scouting hughes than detroit, but they missed what was there. then you had the team drafting right behind them so excited to get hughes that they called it a home run right after they picked him. it's just an interesting lesson in how hard amateur scouting can be to get right.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
Why? He’s playing for a worse team now. I love that he did it, and hope he keeps getting chances. The Sharks are brutal. You can’t take any of their stats seriously. Duclair was a 30 goal guy two seasons ago.

Did he think it was a team problem or did he just want a fresh start? It’s curious you’re making him out to have a bad attitude.

Zadina had made a little under $4M in his career up to that point. You don't give up $4.5M guaranteed money to have your contract terminated unless you think it's a team problem and that you'll do better somewhere else.

Detroit gave him chances on the top line with Larkin and he was still a dud.
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
14,969
11,198
13 points and tied for 2nd worst plus minus in the league.

... Soooo giving up $4.5M over the next two years to sign a $1.1M deal because you thought it was a team problem may not have been the best approach.
To be fair signing with San Jose and expecting they would even have linemates for you is pretty dumb. You've got hertl and couture, who was injured, then they had nothing whatsoever in terms of established guys.

He signed a month before karlsson was traded and Hoffman was brought in, who basically occupies the same slot and role. Also granlund came from that trade who has taken the "free minutes" role zadina was after.

When he signed only five guys were above him and one was couture who was expected not to start the season. Adding Hoffman and granlund pushed him out of the top six.

You can see the logic at least since you see how well barabonov did last year getting ice time with karlsson, only to be even worse than zadina this year. His plus/minus is the same as hertl who is a hugely valuable piece.

It's doubtful the sharks don't qualify him with all the pending ufas they have so he'll get at least another million next year, whereas he may have ended up in grand rapids with his original contract and less suitors down the road. He may get the chance to play with Will Smith or Celebrini next year and get another extension that will put him ahead of where he was in Detroit while also not playing in the AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
To be fair signing with San Jose and expecting they would even have linemates for you is pretty dumb. You've got hertl and couture, who was injured, then they had nothing whatsoever in terms of established guys.

He signed a month before karlsson was traded and Hoffman was brought in, who basically occupies the same slot and role. Also granlund came from that trade who has taken the "free minutes" role zadina was after.

When he signed only five guys were above him and one was couture who was expected not to start the season. Adding Hoffman and granlund pushed him out of the top six.

You can see the logic at least since you see how well barabonov did last year getting ice time with karlsson, only to be even worse than zadina this year. His plus/minus is the same as hertl who is a hugely valuable piece.

It's doubtful the sharks don't qualify him with all the pending ufas they have so he'll get at least another million next year, whereas he may have ended up in grand rapids with his original contract and less suitors down the road. He may get the chance to play with Will Smith or Celebrini next year and get another extension that will put him ahead of where he was in Detroit while also not playing in the AHL.

Smith at 19 and Celebrini at 18 are almost certainly less optimal linemates than prime Dylan Larkin, and Zadina did nothing when he was given that chance.
 

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,499
7,849
Why? He’s playing for a worse team now. I love that he did it, and hope he keeps getting chances. The Sharks are brutal. You can’t take any of their stats seriously. Duclair was a 30 goal guy two seasons ago.

Did he think it was a team problem or did he just want a fresh start? It’s curious you’re making him out to have a bad attitude.
Playing Filip Zadina (and Anthony Duclair) is one of the reasons why the Sharks are brutal.

Zadina is utterly invisible. He contributes nothing offensively or defensively. Unless he suddenly turns into something in the remaining two months of the season, he'll be non-qualified by the worst team in the league this summer.

I have no idea what his attitude is like, and have no reason to care about his draft history. He's simply not an NHL-quality player.
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
14,969
11,198
Smith at 19 and Celebrini at 18 are almost certainly less optimal linemates than prime Dylan Larkin, and Zadina did nothing when he was given that chance.
The difference is Detroit never had the option to run that combo for an entire season regardless of results. They're out of the rebuild trying to make the playoffs. San Jose can let it cook for a year or two without flinching.
 

innitfam

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
2,974
2,241
Zadina was a no brainer pick at the time. 9/10 times, a GM is going to take the prospect rated #3 for majority of the year at 6th overall. Especially over the more riskier, smaller player who was ranked 6th-9th overall.

I never really understood the whole “Detroit flubbed on Hughes”. In hindsight yeah, but Zadina just completely busted into oblivion.
I remember praying that Zadina would be available at #7 for the Canucks. Had visions of Zadina and Boeser filling the net for years to come. Thankfully history played out the way it did though...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57special

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
The difference is Detroit never had the option to run that combo for an entire season regardless of results. They're out of the rebuild trying to make the playoffs. San Jose can let it cook for a year or two without flinching.

Detroit was clearly not out of the rebuild the last two years that Zadina was getting those opportunities and wasting them lol.

I was an apologist of his for the longest time, but it became evident that, while he's a responsible, well rounded player, he just can't score for shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevrondl

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
3,946
4,530
that doesn't really answer my point that scouting is hard. and if he was #3 and a no brainer, why did 3, 4 and 5 pass him by?

nhl scouting groups don't pick according to consensus public draft lists. they pick based on their own scouting. no team had a better look at scouting hughes than detroit, but they missed what was there. then you had the team drafting right behind them so excited to get hughes that they called it a home run right after they picked him. it's just an interesting lesson in how hard amateur scouting can be to get right.

3 and 5 passed because they went off board to lock in a C, the draft "meta" at the time was everybody looking to lock in centres. 4 passed because they were already expecting to take Tkachuk regardless of the Montreal pick.

We know now that the correct meta in 2018 was to pick D high, but people were desperate to pick centres.

2018 was famously light on centres, only 3 were taken before 18, and Hayton and Kotkaniemi were regularly projected to go in the teens

edit:


Of the 18 projections here, they all had him in the top 4, he was #3 in almost all
 
Last edited:

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
25,077
22,124
It's not going well... his hometown club is quite good though!

I admire him for betting on himself. But I'm not sure the bet will ever pay off.

Do not go gently into the dark Filip!
 

Play

Time to play the game
Nov 12, 2021
7,853
6,779
Russia
Zadina was a no brainer pick at the time. 9/10 times, a GM is going to take the prospect rated #3 for majority of the year at 6th overall. Especially over the more riskier, smaller player who was ranked 6th-9th overall.

I never really understood the whole “Detroit flubbed on Hughes”. In hindsight yeah, but Zadina just completely busted into oblivion.
That’s not true, by 2018, the current era of hockey was beginning to form. Lots of fans believed Hughes had a chance to become Scott Niedermayer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Zetterberg Era

olli

Unregistered User
Dec 2, 2016
3,703
1,882
cÃnÃdÃ
To be fair, he was the BPA.

Some scouts had him higher than Svechnikov, while most others said he’s the consensus 3rd overall pick. Then Canadiens went off board and drafted Kotkaniemi, Ottawa was taking Tkachuk regardless, and then Arizona goes REALLY off the board and selects Hayton.

So Zadina was the BPA and you probably would take him over the more riskier prospect like Hughes. Hughes was 5’9 160lbs at the time, and the way he’s evolved his game is quite unprecedented in the modern era.

This isn’t the Tkachuk/Juolevi situation. Zadina was by all means, the BPA. He just… busted, and the guy chosen next to him had the craziest development.
I get Hughes has blown past expectations but 5’9 160 really doesn’t seem that small for an 18 year old.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

🇵🇸 viva 🇵🇸 free 🇵🇸
Dec 24, 2018
12,318
11,113
That's an odd way to frame it.
Sure, but I assume almost everyone here knows roughly where these guys were drafted and it illustrates just how gaping the difference is. If you'd prefer, you can cut the figure in half and take it as an average.
 

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
41,007
11,660
Ft. Myers, FL
I was one of those that let out an expletive on draft night that they didn’t pick Hughes. I thought he was a top 3 talent in terms of Hughes and was lower on Zadina because of his athletic ability.

I will say Zadina never cheated on effort, you always heard the organization and teammates talk about him with high regard. It just hasn’t worked out, I hope he can become a star in Europe and earn a very good living over there. I do think his NHL journey is coming to an end. He doesn’t play fast enough or understand how to find and create space.
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,271
2,515
Just about the only guy who can make me feel good about my Habs picking Kotkaniemi... I totally expected Zadina, and expected a 30-goal scoring winger with some grit.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Sparkplug
Feb 29, 2020
17,424
18,669
tools but no toolbox type of player, also snaken biten as anyone ive ever seen

Not really tools, either.

Weak shot.
Below average hockey IQ.
Average skater.
Average frame.
Below average strength.

The dude just isn't an NHLer. He's a bust. Full stop.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
29,908
18,288
I don't think they need to qualify him. Just chasing draft hype from 6 years earlier doesn't mean much. We'll see, he will turn 25 at the start of next season, QO is for $1.1 million.
 

FightingEmu

Registered User
Apr 10, 2023
18
14
Weak shot? Hes got a shot.

Thing is goalscorers in the modern era need another high end complimentary skill so that they can get that shot off- be it skating/speed, physicality or a ratty side, or some combination of IQ and/or stickhandling- all these things do the same thing- they allow the player to get off their real threat which is their shot. It seems to me that Zadina got his shot off in junior more based off ogf his desperate play style- and that was never going to be a route to sustainable success in the NHL where the dmen get bigger and the defense tightens up. Thats my read anyways- and ftr I agree hes likely a bust- Im just giving ccredit where its at least due- kid can shoot- lol!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DickSmehlik

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,707
14,206
Folsom
Zadina was a good gamble for the Sharks. It's not working out because his offensive ability doesn't produce enough at the NHL level to ignore his massive defensive deficiencies. If the Sharks are looking to compete better next year, they should probably move on from him and sign some free agent wingers that are good for three or four year contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad