Proposal: - SJ / CGY (@Draft) | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Proposal: SJ / CGY (@Draft)

SnipeNCelly

Registered User
Feb 24, 2019
220
72
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season

CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top
 
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline
By acquiring a mid-pairing guy on an expiring contract who doesn't fit the timeline at all?
while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season
Given his age and production, Mortin is in no way a B-chip prospect. He's the kind of ho-hum prospect every team has multiples of.
CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top
The fact that you couldn't even give up the 18th pick....

I will give you some credit for doing a decent job assessing what the Sharks might need. But you overvalued Calgary's assets and are undervaluing the value of #2.
 
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season

CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top
LMAO

Just close this one now
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupfortheSharks
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season

CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top
San Jose says no. Loudly. Angrily. Banging fists on the table, swearing, calling you names, questioning whether your parents are blood relatives, wishing plague on your friends and family.
 
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season

CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top

The Sharks don't need B chip prospects. They need a #1 RHD and RHD only.
 
Last edited:
SJ trades 2nd Overall pick 2025
For
CGY Andersson + Sam Morton RFA rights +2025 1st (FLA)

Helps SJ blueline while obtaining draft capital plus a potential B chip prospect who could join the roster this upcoming season

CGY gets a future 1C

Whos says no ? Also, is there a slight add for calgary to get this done ? Perhaps their 2nd rd pick (54th+/-) on top

Tis the season of shit offers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bizz
By acquiring a mid-pairing guy on an expiring contract who doesn't fit the timeline at all?

Given his age and production, Mortin is in no way a B-chip prospect. He's the kind of ho-hum prospect every team has multiples of.

The fact that you couldn't even give up the 18th pick....

I will give you some credit for doing a decent job assessing what the Sharks might need. But you overvalued Calgary's assets and are undervaluing the value of #2.
Andersson mid paring ? He would be 1st pair on a team like SJ without a doubt .. I think CGY and SJ make good trade partners i just am unsure what gets it done and thought of this and ofcourse I know this isn't a real proposal but just for fun . I think CGY ultimately trades Andersson to BUF but I do know CGY needs a top 5 pick to land a future 1C
 
The Sharks don't need B chip prospects. They need a #1 RHD and RHD only.

Andersson isn't a #1D and never will be.

He did not even offer a B grade prospect he offered a mid-pairing defenseman that they could use but not at the expense of the second overall, a throwaway prospect and the worst of their two first round picks because he's greedy like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bizz
1747964979315.gif
 
Andersson mid paring ? He would be 1st pair on a team like SJ without a doubt .. I think CGY and SJ make good trade partners i just am unsure what gets it done and thought of this and ofcourse I know this isn't a real proposal but just for fun . I think CGY ultimately trades Andersson to BUF but I do know CGY needs a top 5 pick to land a future 1C
The Sharks need a real #1D to build their defense around. Andersson isn't that, and the Sharks can get other d-men in UFA or by trading far less than #2OA.
 
Andersson mid paring ? He would be 1st pair on a team like SJ without a doubt .. I think CGY and SJ make good trade partners i just am unsure what gets it done and thought of this and ofcourse I know this isn't a real proposal but just for fun . I think CGY ultimately trades Andersson to BUF but I do know CGY needs a top 5 pick to land a future 1C

Andersson isn't a #1D and never will be. And looking at his stats, he was a -38 this season, which is usually not worth mentioning except for the fact that was TWO TIMES WORSE than the next lowest player on the team. And also given the fact that he makes 4.5M a season for the next two years, that screams cap dump with negative trade value.

So you want US to trade YOU our 2ND. OVERALL. PICK. for.... what will likely end up being #32 overall.

Get the f*** out of here. Delete your account. and never make a post on the trade boards again.
 
Last edited:
Andersson mid paring ? He would be 1st pair on a team like SJ without a doubt ..
So? On Dallas, he'd be in the bottom pairing; that doesn't make him a bottom-pairing defenseman.
I think CGY and SJ make good trade partners i just am unsure what gets it done and thought of this and ofcourse I know this isn't a real proposal but just for fun .
Sure it's just for fun, but that doesn't excuse a bad proposal. Fundamentally, you drastically overvalued Calgary's assets and undervalued the #2 pick.

Put another way, Andersson is likely traded at the deadline...for, at best, another first-round pick that's likely late in the draft.

Would any team trade the #2 for two late first-round picks and a ho-hum prospect? Would Calgary have accepted that for #6 in 2016?
I think CGY ultimately trades Andersson to BUF but I do know CGY needs a top 5 pick to land a future 1C
Just because Calgary has a need does not mean that the rest of the league will happily provide it for them
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad