If Trouba thinks he's worth $ 7.5 to 8 mil-- then it's likely he signs "mid term"--like for 3-4 years in the $ 6 to 6.5 range --get financial security, and be gone as a free agent when that term comes up. We'll see what happens ??
Last edited:
I'd say 3rd at best. I'm sure glad "we" arent the GM He might be just a tad overvalued around here.if trouba worked half as hard as shief does in the off season he would be a norris candidate. but i get the feeling he enjoys the game just not the hard work you have to put in away from the ice. hes still our 2nd best d man.
sorry but morrisey isnt better than trouba as of today. hes close but when both are "on" trouba is alot better. imo of course and i wish i was the gm .. how much is chevy getting paidI'd say 3rd at best. I'm sure glad "we" arent the GM He might be just a tad overvalued around here.
sorry but morrisey isnt better than trouba as of today. hes close but when both are "on" trouba is alot better. imo of course and i wish i was the gm .. how much is chevy getting paid
What makes you think Trouba is better than Mo?sorry but morrisey isnt better than trouba as of today. hes close but when both are "on" trouba is alot better. imo of course and i wish i was the gm .. how much is chevy getting paid
opinionWhat makes you think Trouba is better than Mo?
Mo seems to make fewer mistakes doesn't just look to blast the puck every time. Trouba is the better athlete. Mo has to cover up for Trouba on a 2 on 1 more than Trouba has to cover for Mo. That just be a stylistic difference.opinion
we def can trouba is bigger stronger and has more of an edge. they compliment each other very well. and i think our system calls for the right side to pinch harder since those are our "offensive" d men while the left side is called on to hold the fort more less i think thats the reason for more 2 on 1s that we remember. i would say morrisey might also be more consistent but when both are having their Aplus game i think trouba is alot better. again imoMo seems to make fewer mistakes doesn't just look to blast the puck every time. Trouba is the better athlete. Mo has to cover up for Trouba on a 2 on 1 more than Trouba has to cover for Mo. That just be a stylistic difference.
You could probably make as many points about why Trouba is better than Mo.
I will say that Trouba is a remarkable athlete, perfect D build and that beautiful stride. I think 44 just has so much more upstairs. Back to the subject however, I just don't want the Jets committing 50M$, I think thats $ better spent elsewhere. If they do something around 5.5 annually I'd be interested. Any more is an overpay.
we def can trouba is bigger stronger and has more of an edge. they compliment each other very well. and i think our system calls for the right side to pinch harder since those are our "offensive" d men while the left side is called on to hold the fort more less i think thats the reason for more 2 on 1s that we remember. i would say morrisey might also be more consistent but when both are having their Aplus game i think trouba is alot better. again imo
This. So far Jomo has proven to be much more durable albeit in a smaller sample. I give Jake a slight edge on offence and physicality but I don't think he's more important to the team.Morrissey has also barely missed a game. Trouba plays about 60 a year.
I will say that Trouba is a remarkable athlete, perfect D build and that beautiful stride. I think 44 just has so much more upstairs. Back to the subject however, I just don't want the Jets committing 50M$, I think thats $ better spent elsewhere. If they do something around 5.5 annually I'd be interested. Any more is an overpay.